Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21767504›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2011

Study of receptor-chaperone interactions using the optical technique of spectroscopic ellipsometry.

Verena Kriechbaumer, Anna Tsargorodskaya, Mohd K Mustafa, Tatiana Vinogradova, Joanne Lacey, David P Smith, Benjamin M Abell, Alexei Nabok

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Verena KriechbaumerBiomedical Research Centre, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, United Kingdom. v.kriechbaumer@shu.ac.uk
Anna Tsargorodskaya
Mohd K Mustafa
Tatiana Vinogradova
Joanne Lacey
David P Smith
Benjamin M Abell
Alexei Nabok

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E01559X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work describes a detailed quantitative interaction study between the novel plastidial chaperone receptor OEP61 and isoforms of the chaperone types Hsp70 and Hsp90 using the optical method of total internal reflection ellipsometry (TIRE). The receptor OEP61 was electrostatically immobilized on a gold surface via an intermediate layer of polycations. The TIRE measurements allowed the evaluation of thickness changes in the adsorbed molecular layers as a result of chaperone binding to receptor proteins. Hsp70 chaperone isoforms but not Hsp90 were shown to be capable of binding OEP61. Dynamic TIRE measurements were carried out to evaluate the affinity constants of the above reactions and resulted in clear discrimination between specific and nonspecific binding of chaperones as well as differences in binding properties between the highly similar Hsp70 isoforms.

Indexed as

AnimalsArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsCalibrationHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsKineticsModels, BiologicalMolecular ChaperonesOptics and PhotonicsProtein BindingProtein TransportRabbitsReceptors, Cell SurfaceSpectrum AnalysisArabidopsis ProteinsHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsMolecular ChaperonesOEP61 protein, ArabidopsisReceptors, Cell Surface

Identifiers

PMID21767504
PMCPMC3136773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.