Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21767483›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2011

Multivalent binding of nanocarrier to endothelial cells under shear flow.

Jin Liu, Neeraj J Agrawal, Andres Calderon, Portonovo S Ayyaswamy, David M Eckmann, Ravi Radhakrishnan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Thermodynamic free energy methods to investigate shape transitions in bilayer membranes.International journal of advances in engineering sciences and applied mathematics · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jin LiuDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Neeraj J Agrawal
Andres Calderon
Portonovo S Ayyaswamy
David M Eckmann
Ravi Radhakrishnan
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Targeted Microcarrier Design and OptimizationR01EB006818 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ECKMANN, DAVID M · 2008 to 2016
$3.3M
Targeting Carriers with Controlled Geometry to EndotheliumR01HL087036 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MUZYKANTOV, VLADIMIR R · 2008 to 2012
$2.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL087036NHLBI NIH HHS R01-HL087036NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB006818NIBIB NIH HHS R01-EB006818
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigate the effects of particle size, shear flow, and resistance due to the glycocalyx on the multivalent binding of functionalized nanocarriers (NC) to endothelial cells (ECs). We address the much- debated issue of shear-enhanced binding by computing the binding free-energy landscapes of NC binding to the EC surface when the system is subjected to shear, using a model and simulation methodology based on the Metropolis Monte Carlo approach. The binding affinities calculated based on the free-energy profiles are found to be in excellent agreement with experimental measurements for different-sized NCs. The model suggests that increasing the size of NCs significantly increases the multivalency but only moderately enhances the binding affinities due to the entropy loss associated with bound receptors on the EC surface. A significant prediction of our model is that under flow conditions, the binding free energies of NCs are a nonmonotonic function of the shear force. They show a well-defined minimum at a critical shear value, and thus quantitatively mimic the shear-enhanced binding behavior observed in various experiments. More significantly, our results indicate that the interplay between multivalent binding and shear force can reproduce the shear-enhanced binding phenomenon, which suggests that under certain conditions, this phenomenon can also occur in systems that do not show a catch-bond behavior. In addition, the model also suggests that the impact of the glycocalyx thickness on NC binding affinity is exponential, implying a highly nonlinear effect of the glycocalyx on binding.

Indexed as

RheologyStress, MechanicalEndothelial CellsGlycocalyxModels, BiologicalNanoparticlesParticle SizeReceptors, Cell SurfaceSurface PropertiesReceptors, Cell Surface

Identifiers

PMID21767483
PMCPMC3136762
OpenAlexW2075369758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.