Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21766975›Full record

Trial reportPsychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors2011

Incident-specific and individual-level moderators of brief intervention effects with mandated college students.

Nadine R Mastroleo, James G Murphy, Suzanne M Colby, Peter M Monti, Nancy P Barnett

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Motivational interviewing for substance use reduction.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Alcohol interventions for mandated college students: A meta-analytic review.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nadine R MastroleoCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA. nadine_mastroleo@brown.edu
James G Murphy
Suzanne M Colby
Peter M Monti
Nancy P Barnett
Brown University · USUniversity of Memphis · US

Funding

ALCOHOL INTERVENTION/TREATMENT OUTCOME RESEARCH TRAININGT32AA007459 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI ROBERT MIRANDA, PETER M. MONTI · 1986 to 2026
$13.3M
MOTIVATIONAL INTERVIEWS FOR MANDATED ETOH EDUCATIONR01AA012158 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI BARNETT, NANCY P · 2000 to 2003
$862k
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA 012158NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA012158NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA007459NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA 07459
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brief Motivational Interventions (BMI) and Computer-delivered interventions (CDI) have been successful in reducing drinking behaviors with mandated college students. However, research examining moderators of intervention effects have found mixed results. The current study sought to replicate and extend the research on moderators of intervention efficacy with mandated students. Baseline alcohol-related problems, readiness to change, gender, incident consequences, and participant responses to the event (personal attributions about the incident, aversiveness of the incident) were examined as moderators of intervention and booster condition efficacy on alcohol use and problems. Mandated students (N = 225) were randomized to complete either a BMI or CDI (Alcohol 101; Century Council, 1998), with or without a 1-month booster session, following a campus alcohol sanction. Outcomes were measured three months after baseline. Attributions moderated intervention condition such that participants low in personal attributions for their incident showed significantly less drinking following a CDI than a BMI. Men and individuals who reported low incident aversiveness showed higher drinks per occasion after receiving a booster, while individuals high in alcohol-related problems reported fewer heavy drinking days after completing a booster session. Findings suggest that identifying specific characteristics related to the precipitating event may inform intervention approaches in this high-risk population; however, additional research is needed to offer concrete guidance to practitioners in the field.

Indexed as

Mandatory ProgramsAdolescentAlcohol DrinkingAlcoholic IntoxicationAnalysis of VarianceAttitudeCounselingEffect Modifier, EpidemiologicFemaleHumansMaleMotivationNew EnglandOutcome Assessment, Health CarePsychotherapy, BriefReferral and Consultation

Identifiers

PMID21766975
PMCPMC3676278
OpenAlexW1968122559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.