ArticleThe patient2011
Exploring qualitative research synthesis: the role of patients' perspectives in health policy design and decision making.
Article in The patient, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Experience of people with rheumatoid arthritis living with fatigue: a qualitative metasynthesis.BMJ open · 2019Pooled it
- A methodological systematic review of meta-ethnography conduct to articulate the complex analytical phases.BMC medical research methodology · 2019Pooled it
- The patient perspective of diabetes care: a systematic review of stated preference research.The patient · 2014Pooled it
- Use of Direct-to-Consumer Telemedicine: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Thoughts, Perspectives and Experiences of Australian Adults.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Parental factors affecting their participation in decision-making for neonates with life-threatening conditions: A qualitative study Parents' participation in decision-making.Journal of education and health promotion · 2024Article
- Development and Initial Validity of the Patients' Literacy Scale Among Outpatients in Hangzhou City, China.Patient preference and adherence · 2022Article
- Potential Barriers of Patient Involvement in Health Technology Assessment in Central and Eastern European Countries.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Conducting Qualitative Research Online: Challenges and Solutions.The patient · 2021Article
- Physical activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis - an agile lifelong behaviour: a qualitative meta-synthesis.RMD open · 2021Article
- How to Improve Integrated Care for People with Chronic Conditions: Key Findings from EU FP-7 Project INTEGRATE and Beyond.International journal of integrated care · 2017Article
- Involvement of patients with lung and gynecological cancer and their relatives in psychosocial cancer rehabilitation: a narrative review.The patient · 2015Review
- Article
- A meta-ethnography and theory of parental ethical decision making in the neonatal intensive care unit.Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN · 2013Review
- Qualitative approaches to understanding patient preferences.The patient · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Health systems are placing more and more emphasis on the design and delivery of services that are focused on the patient, and there is a growing interest in patient involvement in health policy research and health technology assessment (HTA). Furthermore, there is a growing research interest in eliciting patients' views, not only on 'what works' for patients but also on the need for intervention and on factors influencing the implementation of particular health technologies, their appropriateness and acceptability. This article focuses on qualitative research synthesis in eliciting patients' perspectives. Its aim is to bring research closer to policy development and decision making, to facilitate better use of research findings for health and welfare, to generate a body of evidence, and to ensure that effective and appropriate information is used in health policy decision design. A variety of synthesizing approaches in qualitative research are explored, such as meta-synthesis, meta-summary, meta-ethnography, and meta-study, focusing especially on methodology. Meta-synthesis and meta-ethnography are probably the most frequently cited approaches in qualitative research synthesis and have perhaps the most developed methodology. The implications of these various synthesizing approaches in relation to health policy and HTA are discussed, and we suggest that meta-synthesis and meta-summary are particularly useful approaches. They have an explicit focus on 'evidence synthesis', fairly clear methodologies, and they are designed to not only present interpretations of the findings but also integrate research findings. Qualitative research synthesis enables researchers to synthesize findings from multiple qualitative studies on patients' perspectives instead of establishing new, expensive, and perhaps redundant studies that might intrude on the lives of patients. Qualitative research synthesis is highly recommended by decision makers and in health policy research and HTA. In cases where patient assessment is important to overall success, it can provide those responsible for policy and decision making with a broad and varied range of knowledge about patients' perspectives before they make decisions on the application of health technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21766910What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.