Individualized cost-effectiveness analysis.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Qualitative process study to explore the perceived burdens and benefits of a digital intervention for self-managing high blood pressure in Primary Care in the UK.BMJ open · 2018
   Trial
2. Cost-effectiveness of a national exercise referral programme for primary care patients in Wales: results of a randomised controlled trial.BMC public health · 2013
   Trial
3. Understanding healthcare efficiency-an AI-supported narrative review of diverse terminologies used.BMC medical education · 2025
   Review
4. Minimal differences observed when comparing the morphological profiling of microglia obtained by confocal laser scanning and optical sectioning microscopy.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2024
   Article
5. Challenges around quantifying uncertainty in a holistic approach to hard-to-heal wound management: Health economic perspective.International wound journal · 2023
   Article
6. The Online Elicitation of Personal Utility Functions (OPUF) tool: a new method for valuing health states.Wellcome open research · 2022
   Article
7. Continuous Glucose Monitoring as a Matter of Justice.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2021
   Article
8. COVID outcome prediction in the emergency department (COPE): using retrospective Dutch hospital data to develop simple and valid models for predicting mortality and need for intensive care unit admission in patients who present at the emergency department with suspected COVID-19.BMJ open · 2021
   Article
9. How to assess the value of low-value care.BMC health services research · 2020
   Article
10. Scientific challenges for precision public health.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2020
    Review
11. The Predictive Approaches to Treatment effect Heterogeneity (PATH) Statement: Explanation and Elaboration.Annals of internal medicine · 2020
    Article
12. Incorporating Future Medical Costs: Impact on Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Cancer Patients.PharmacoEconomics · 2019
    Article
13. Predicting Therapy Success and Costs for Personalized Treatment Recommendations Using Baseline Characteristics: Data-Driven Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2018
    Article
14. Patient Variability Seldom Assessed in Cost-effectiveness Studies.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2018
    Review
15. Cost-effectiveness analysis in cardiac surgery: A review of its concepts and methodologies.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2018
    Review
16. Understanding the Value of Individualized Information: The Impact of Poor Calibration or Discrimination in Outcome Prediction Models.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2017
    Article
17. Biases in Individualized Cost-effectiveness Analysis: Influence of Choices in Modeling Short-Term, Trial-Based, Mortality Risk Reduction and Post-Trial Life Expectancy.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2017
    Article
18. Costs and expected gain in lifetime health from intensive care versus general ward care of 30,712 individual patients: a distribution-weighted cost-effectiveness analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2017
    Article
19. Economic analysis of revision amputation and replantation treatment of finger amputation injuries.Plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2014
    Article
20. A generalised model for individualising a treatment recommendation based on group-level evidence from randomised clinical trials.BMJ open · 2013
    Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as