Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21765476›Full record

ArticleOncogene2012

CHEK2 genomic and proteomic analyses reveal genetic inactivation or endogenous activation across the 60 cell lines of the US National Cancer Institute.

G Zoppoli, S Solier, W C Reinhold, H Liu, J W Connelly, A Monks, R H Shoemaker, O D Abaan, S R Davis, P S Meltzer and 2 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cells · 2020
    Review
  5. Versatile in vivo regulation of tumor phenotypes by dCas9-mediated transcriptional perturbation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  6. Article
  7. CHEK2 mutation and risk of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

G ZoppoliLaboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. gabriele.zoppoli@unige.it
S Solier
W C Reinhold
H Liu
J W Connelly
A Monks
R H Shoemaker
O D Abaan
S R Davis
P S Meltzer
J H Doroshow
Y Pommier
Center for Cancer Research · USNational Cancer Institute · USNational Institutes of Health · USScience Applications International Corporation (United States) · US

Funding

DNA Repair, Cell Cycle Checkpoints and Apoptosis as Targets for Anticancer DrugsZIABC006150 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI POMMIER, YVES · 2009 to 2025
$23.0M
Cancer Genomics Technology DevelopmentZIABC011091 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI MELTZER, PAUL S. · 2009 to 2025
$16.9M
Phase 01 Clinical TrialsZIABC011078 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI DOROSHOW, JAMES · 2009 to 2025
$9.0M
RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) of the NCI-60ZICBC011497 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI REINHOLD, WILLIAM · 2013 to 2025
$1.7M
PROTEIN-ASSOCIATED DNA BREAKS AS INDICATOR OF TOPOISOMERASE INHIBITIONZ01BC006150 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI POMMIER, YVES · 1996 to 2008
$1.5M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC006150Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIC BC011497
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CHEK2 encodes a serine/threonine kinase (Chk2) activated by ATM in response to DNA double-strand breaks. On the one hand, CHEK2 has been described as a tumor suppressor with proapoptotic, cell-cycle checkpoint and mitotic functions. On the other hand, Chk2 is also commonly activated (phosphorylated at T68) in cancers and precancerous lesions. Here, we report an extensive characterization of CHEK2 across the panel of 60 established cancer cell lines from the NCI Anticancer Screen (the NCI-60) using genomic and proteomic analyses, including exon-specific mRNA expression, DNA copy-number variation (CNV) by aCGH, exome sequencing, as well as western blot analyses for total and activated (pT68-Chk2) Chk2. We show that the high heterogeneity of Chk2 levels in cancer cells is primarily due to its inactivation (owing to low gene expression, alternative splicing, point mutations, copy-number alterations and premature truncation) or reduction of protein levels. Moreover, we observe that a significant percentage of cancer cells (12% of the NCI-60 and HeLa cells) show high endogenous Chk2 activation, which is always associated with p53 inactivation, and which is accompanied by downregulation of the Fanconi anemia and homologous recombination pathways. We also report the presence of activated Chk2 (pT68-Chk2) along with histone γ-H2AX in centrosomes.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene SilencingAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsCell Line, TumorCheckpoint Kinase 2Chromosomal InstabilityDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA DamageExonsFanconi AnemiaGenomicsHumansNeoplasmsPhosphorylationPoint MutationAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsATM protein, humanCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 2CHEK2 protein, humanDNA-Binding ProteinsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesRNA, MessengerTumor Suppressor Protein p53Tumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21765476
PMCPMC7489305
OpenAlexW2061375242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.