Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21764993›Full record

ArticleThe Plant cell2011

The defective proteasome but not substrate recognition function is responsible for the null phenotypes of the Arabidopsis proteasome subunit RPN10.

Ya-Ling Lin, Shu-Chiun Sung, Hwang-Long Tsai, Ting-Ting Yu, Ramalingam Radjacommare, Raju Usharani, Antony S Fatimababy, Hsia-Yin Lin, Ya-Ying Wang, Hongyong Fu

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Plant cell, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ya-Ling LinInstitute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei 115, Republic of China.
Shu-Chiun Sung
Hwang-Long Tsai
Ting-Ting Yu
Ramalingam Radjacommare
Raju Usharani
Antony S Fatimababy
Hsia-Yin Lin
Ya-Ying Wang
Hongyong Fu
National Chung Hsing University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ubiquitylated substrate recognition during ubiquitin/proteasome-mediated proteolysis (UPP) is mediated directly by the proteasome subunits RPN10 and RPN13 and indirectly by ubiquitin-like (UBL) and ubiquitin-associated (UBA) domain-containing factors. To dissect the complexity and functional roles of UPP substrate recognition in Arabidopsis thaliana, potential UPP substrate receptors were characterized. RPN10 and members of the UBL-UBA-containing RAD23 and DSK2 families displayed strong affinities for Lys-48-linked ubiquitin chains (the major UPP signals), indicating that they are involved in ubiquitylated substrate recognition. Additionally, RPN10 uses distinct interfaces as primary proteasomal docking sites for RAD23s and DSK2s. Analyses of T-DNA insertion knockout or RNA interference knockdown mutants of potential UPP ubiquitin receptors, including RPN10, RPN13, RAD23a-d, DSK2a-b, DDI1, and NUB1, demonstrated that only the RPN10 mutant gave clear phenotypes. The null rpn10-2 showed decreased double-capped proteasomes, increased 20S core complexes, and pleiotropic vegetative and reproductive growth phenotypes. Surprisingly, the observed rpn10-2 phenotypes were rescued by a RPN10 variant defective in substrate recognition, indicating that the defectiveness of RPN10 in proteasome but not substrate recognition function is responsible for the null phenotypes. Our results suggest that redundant recognition pathways likely are used in Arabidopsis to target ubiquitylated substrates for proteasomal degradation and that their specific roles in vivo require further examination.

Indexed as

PhenotypeArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsBinding SitesDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Repair EnzymesFlowersGenetic Complementation TestHumansMolecular Sequence DataPlant LeavesPlants, Genetically ModifiedProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexProtein BindingProtein SubunitsProteolysisArabidopsis ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Repair EnzymesProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexProtein SubunitsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsRPN10 protein, ArabidopsisUbiquitin-Protein LigasesUbiquitins

Identifiers

PMID21764993
PMCPMC3226219
OpenAlexW2113439274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.