Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21764952›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2011

Distinct microbial communities within the endosphere and rhizosphere of Populus deltoides roots across contrasting soil types.

Neil R Gottel, Hector F Castro, Marilyn Kerley, Zamin Yang, Dale A Pelletier, Mircea Podar, Tatiana Karpinets, Ed Uberbacher, Gerald A Tuskan, Rytas Vilgalys and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 219 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
219citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

219 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genomic signatures inmSystems · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Frontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  19. Insights into the association ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  20. Review

159 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Neil R GottelBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6038, USA.
Hector F Castro
Marilyn Kerley
Zamin Yang
Dale A Pelletier
Mircea Podar
Tatiana Karpinets
Ed Uberbacher
Gerald A Tuskan
Rytas Vilgalys
Mitchel J Doktycz
Christopher W Schadt

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The root-rhizosphere interface of Populus is the nexus of a variety of associations between bacteria, fungi, and the host plant and an ideal model for studying interactions between plants and microorganisms. However, such studies have generally been confined to greenhouse and plantation systems. Here we analyze microbial communities from the root endophytic and rhizospheric habitats of Populus deltoides in mature natural trees from both upland and bottomland sites in central Tennessee. Community profiling utilized 454 pyrosequencing with separate primers targeting the V4 region for bacterial 16S rRNA and the D1/D2 region for fungal 28S rRNA genes. Rhizosphere bacteria were dominated by Acidobacteria (31%) and Alphaproteobacteria (30%), whereas most endophytes were from the Gammaproteobacteria (54%) as well as Alphaproteobacteria (23%). A single Pseudomonas-like operational taxonomic unit (OTU) accounted for 34% of endophytic bacterial sequences. Endophytic bacterial richness was also highly variable and 10-fold lower than in rhizosphere samples originating from the same roots. Fungal rhizosphere and endophyte samples had approximately equal amounts of the Pezizomycotina (40%), while the Agaricomycotina were more abundant in the rhizosphere (34%) than endosphere (17%). Both fungal and bacterial rhizosphere samples were highly clustered compared to the more variable endophyte samples in a UniFrac principal coordinates analysis, regardless of upland or bottomland site origin. Hierarchical clustering of OTU relative abundance patterns also showed that the most abundant bacterial and fungal OTUs tended to be dominant in either the endophyte or rhizosphere samples but not both. Together, these findings demonstrate that root endophytic communities are distinct assemblages rather than opportunistic subsets of the rhizosphere.

Indexed as

BiodiversitySoil MicrobiologyBacteriaDNA, BacterialDNA, FungalDNA, RibosomalFungiGenes, rRNAPlant RootsPopulusRhizosphereRNA, BacterialRNA, FungalRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 18SSequence Analysis, DNADNA, BacterialDNA, FungalDNA, RibosomalRNA, BacterialRNA, FungalRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 18S

Identifiers

PMID21764952
PMCPMC3165402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.