Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21764922›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2011

Action at a distance: amino acid substitutions that affect binding of the phosphorylated CheY response regulator and catalysis of dephosphorylation can be far from the CheZ phosphatase active site.

Ashalla M Freeman, Beth M Mole, Ruth E Silversmith, Robert B Bourret

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Rational Protein Engineering Guided by Deep Mutational Scanning.International journal of molecular sciences · 2015
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ashalla M FreemanDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7290, USA.
Beth M Mole
Ruth E Silversmith
Robert B Bourret
Bipar · FRUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

SEEDING POSTDOCTORAL INNOVATORS IN RESEARCH &EDUCATIONK12GM000678 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DONALD T LYSLE, Kathryn Joanna Reissner · 1999 to 2026
$30.9M
Molecular Mechanisms of Signal Transduction by Two-Component Regulatory SystemsR01GM050860 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BOURRET, ROBERT B. · 1994 to 2025
$7.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS 5K12GM000678NIGMS NIH HHS GM050860NIGMS NIH HHS K12 GM000678NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM050860
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two-component regulatory systems, in which phosphorylation controls the activity of a response regulator protein, provide signal transduction in bacteria. For example, the phosphorylated CheY response regulator (CheYp) controls swimming behavior. In Escherichia coli, the chemotaxis phosphatase CheZ stimulates the dephosphorylation of CheYp. CheYp apparently binds first to the C terminus of CheZ and then binds to the active site where dephosphorylation occurs. The phosphatase activity of the CheZ(2) dimer exhibits a positively cooperative dependence on CheYp concentration, apparently because the binding of the first CheYp to CheZ(2) is inhibited compared to the binding of the second CheYp. Thus, CheZ phosphatase activity is reduced at low CheYp concentrations. The CheZ21IT gain-of-function substitution, located far from either the CheZ active site or C-terminal CheY binding site, enhances CheYp binding and abolishes cooperativity. To further explore mechanisms regulating CheZ activity, we isolated 10 intragenic suppressor mutations of cheZ21IT that restored chemotaxis. The suppressor substitutions were located along the central portion of CheZ and were not allele specific. Five suppressor mutants tested biochemically diminished the binding of CheYp and/or the catalysis of dephosphorylation, even when the suppressor substitutions were distant from the active site. One suppressor mutant also restored cooperativity to CheZ21IT. Consideration of results from this and previous studies suggests that the binding of CheYp to the CheZ active site (not to the C terminus) is rate limiting and leads to cooperative phosphatase activity. Furthermore, amino acid substitutions distant from the active site can affect CheZ catalytic activity and CheYp binding, perhaps via the propagation of structural or dynamic perturbations through a helical bundle.

Indexed as

LocomotionAmino Acid SubstitutionBacterial ProteinsBinding SitesCatalytic DomainEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsMembrane ProteinsMethyl-Accepting Chemotaxis ProteinsModels, MolecularPhosphatesPhosphoric Monoester HydrolasesProtein BindingProtein Structure, QuaternarySuppression, GeneticBacterial ProteinscheY protein, E coliEscherichia coli ProteinsMembrane ProteinsMethyl-Accepting Chemotaxis ProteinsPhosphatesPhosphoric Monoester Hydrolases

Identifiers

PMID21764922
PMCPMC3165703
OpenAlexW2115472563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.