Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21764378›Full record

ReviewTrends in parasitology2011

Genome cartography: charting the apicomplexan genome.

Jessica C Kissinger, Jeremy DeBarry

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in parasitology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. The landscape of transposable element distribution in the genome of Neotropical fish Apareiodon sp. (Characiformes: Parodontidae).Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Challenges forGenes · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Genomics of apicomplexan parasites.Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jessica C KissingerCenter for Tropical and Emerging Global Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, USA. jkissing@uga.edu
Jeremy DeBarry

Funding

Genome Evolution, Innovation and Adaptation in the ApicomplexaR01AI068908 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI KISSINGER, JESSICA C · 2007 to 2010
$1.3M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI068908
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genes reside in particular genomic contexts that can be mapped at many levels. Historically, 'genetic maps' were used primarily to locate genes. Recent technological advances in the determination of genome sequences have made the analysis and comparison of whole genomes possible and increasingly tractable. What do we see if we shift our focus from gene content (the 'inventory' of genes contained within a genome) to the composition and organization of a genome? This review examines what has been learned about the evolution of the apicomplexan genome as well as the significance and impact of genomic location on our understanding of the eukaryotic genome and parasite biology.

Indexed as

Genes, ProtozoanGenomeApicomplexaCentromereChromatinChromosome MappingEvolution, MolecularGene Expression RegulationGene Transfer, HorizontalMitochondriaSyntenyTelomereChromatin

Identifiers

PMID21764378
PMCPMC3160794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.