Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21764238›Full record

ArticlePatient education and counseling2012

Expressing uncertainty in clinical interactions between physicians and older patients: what matters?

Ming Tai-Seale, Cheryl Stults, Weimin Zhang, Martha Shumway

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient education and counseling, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. How and why do doctors communicate diagnostic uncertainty: An experimental vignette study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  7. Communicating uncertainties when disclosing diagnostic test results for (Alzheimer's) dementia in the memory clinic: The ABIDE project.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020
    Observational
  8. Article
  9. Uncertainty and Competing Priorities in Shared Clinical Decision-Making.Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ming Tai-SealeHealth Policy Research, Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA 94301-2302, USA. Tai-SealeM@pamfri.org
Cheryl Stults
Weimin Zhang
Martha Shumway

Funding

Economic Analysis of Depression Treatment ProcessK01MH001935 · NIMH · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CTR · PI TAI-SEALE, MING · 2002 to 2006
$745k
ASSESSMENT OF DOCTOR ELDERLY PATIENT ENCOUNTERSR44AG015737 · NIA · JVC RADIOLOGY AND MEDICAL ANALYSIS · PI COOK, MARY A · 1998 to 2000
$226k
NIA NIH HHS AG15737NIA NIH HHS R44 AG015737NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH001935NIMH NIH HHS MH01935
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveUncertainty is one key factor influencing physician and patient behavior. We examined the propensity to express uncertainty on mental health versus biomedical issues by elderly patients (>65 years) and physicians during primary care visits.

methods385 videotaped visits were coded according to "topics," which are issues raised by any participant during the visit. This approach allowed us to examine if uncertainty was expressed in biomedical, mental health or other topics, and the factors associated with expressions of uncertainty.

resultsWe found that patients expressed uncertainty in 20.21% of topics compared to physicians expressing uncertainty in 11.73% of topics discussed in all visits. Patients expressed uncertainty in 22% of biomedical and 46.5% (p<0.01) of mental health topics. Similar statistics were found in physicians' expression of uncertainty with more uncertainty being expressed with mental health topics (23.9%) than biomedical topics (12.56%, p<0.05).

conclusionPatients expressed more uncertainties than physicians during visits. Patients and physicians both expressed more uncertainties on mental health topics suggesting that patients and primary care physicians felt less knowledgeable or less confident about dealing with mental health issues. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Understanding the inherent uncertainties in medicine can help physicians and patients engage in more productive discussion about both biomedical and mental health topics.

Indexed as

CommunicationPhysician-Patient RelationsUncertaintyAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthOffice VisitsPatient SatisfactionPhysiciansPractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID21764238
PMCPMC3206164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.