Trial reportLancet (London, England)2011
Sertraline or mirtazapine for depression in dementia (HTA-SADD): a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 176 papers, 20 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
176 citing papers in PubMed, 20 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 523 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role and impact of therapeutic counselling on the emotional experience of adults living with dementia: A systematic review.Dementia (London, England) · 2024Pooled it
- Psychological therapies for depression in older adults residing in long-term care settings.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- A systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy outcomes of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in depression in Alzheimer's disease.BMC neurology · 2023Pooled it
- Psychological treatments for depression and anxiety in dementia and mild cognitive impairment.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy of interventions for reducing symptoms of depression in people with dementia: systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Effects of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) on cognitive function. A systematic review of RCTs.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020Pooled it
- Antidepressants for treating depression in dementia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Pharmacological interventions for apathy in Alzheimer's disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Efficacy and tolerability of antidepressants in Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.International journal of geriatric psychiatry · 2018Pooled it
- Efficacy of Antidepressants for Depression in Alzheimer's Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2017Pooled it
- Guidelines for dementia or Parkinson's disease with depression or anxiety: a systematic review.BMC neurology · 2016Pooled it
- Psychological treatments for depression and anxiety in dementia and mild cognitive impairment: systematic review and meta-analysis.The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science · 2015Pooled it
- Practical clinical trials in psychopharmacology: a systematic review.Journal of clinical psychopharmacology · 2015Pooled it
- Psychological treatments for depression and anxiety in dementia and mild cognitive impairment.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Systematic review of non-pharmacologic interventions to delay functional decline in community-dwelling patients with dementia.Aging & mental health · 2013Pooled it
- Effect of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in Alzheimer's disease with comorbid depression: a meta-analysis of depression and cognitive outcomes.Drugs & aging · 2012Pooled it
- Dementia.BMJ clinical evidence · 2012Pooled it
- [Antidepressants for treatment of depression in palliative patients : a systematic literature review].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2012Pooled it
- A review of the effectiveness of antidepressant medications for depressed nursing home residents.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2012Pooled it
116 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
25 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDepression is common in dementia but the evidence base for appropriate drug treatment is sparse and equivocal. We aimed to assess efficacy and safety of two of the most commonly prescribed drugs, sertraline and mirtazapine, compared with placebo.
methodsWe undertook the parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Health Technology Assessment Study of the Use of Antidepressants for Depression in Dementia (HTA-SADD) trial in participants from old-age psychiatry services in nine centres in England. Participants were eligible if they had probable or possible Alzheimer's disease, depression (lasting ≥4 weeks), and a Cornell scale for depression in dementia (CSDD) score of 8 or more. Participants were ineligible if they were clinically critical (eg, suicide risk), contraindicated to study drugs, on antidepressants, in another trial, or had no carer. The clinical trials unit at King's College London (UK) randomly allocated participants with a computer-generated block randomisation sequence, stratified by centre, with varying block sizes, in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive sertraline (target dose 150 mg per day), mirtazapine (45 mg), or placebo (control group), all with standard care. The primary outcome was reduction in depression (CSDD score) at 13 weeks (outcomes to 39 weeks were also assessed), assessed with a mixed linear-regression model adjusted for baseline CSDD, time, and treatment centre. This study is registered, number ISRCTN88882979 and EudraCT 2006-000105-38.
findingsDecreases in depression scores at 13 weeks did not differ between 111 controls and 107 participants allocated to receive sertraline (mean difference 1·17, 95% CI -0·23 to 2·58; p=0·10) or mirtazapine (0·01, -1·37 to 1·38; p=0·99), or between participants in the mirtazapine and sertraline groups (1·16, -0·25 to 2·57; p=0·11); these findings persisted to 39 weeks. Fewer controls had adverse reactions (29 of 111 [26%]) than did participants in the sertraline group (46 of 107, 43%; p=0·010) or mirtazapine group (44 of 108, 41%; p=0·031), and fewer serious adverse events rated as severe (p=0·003). Five patients in every group died by week 39.
interpretationBecause of the absence of benefit compared with placebo and increased risk of adverse events, the present practice of use of these antidepressants, with usual care, for first-line treatment of depression in Alzheimer's disease should be reconsidered.
fundingUK National Institute of Health Research HTA Programme.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.