ArticleNeurobiology of learning and memory2011
A novel operant testing regimen for multi-construct cognitive characterization of a murine model of Alzheimer's amyloid-related behavioral impairment.
Article in Neurobiology of learning and memory, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Longitudinal Cognitive Decline in a Novel Rodent Model of Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy Type-1.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A common method for modeling pathological and behavioral aspects of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the transgenic mouse. While transgenic strains are often well characterized pathologically, behavioral studies of cognitive deficits often employ a limited set of aversively motivated, spatial learning and memory tests, under brief testing periods. Here we illustrate an alternative operant behavioral methodology to provide a comprehensive characterization under repetitive testing conditions, and with appetitive motivation. In this study, we employed the commonly used Tg2576 murine model of Alzheimer's disease amyloid pathology, since it has been the subject of many previous behavioral studies. In these mice, we compared the learning of simple and complex, as well as spatial and non-spatial rules. The mice were assessed on a progressively more complex and interlocking battery of operant tasks, ranging from simple rule learning to delayed recall, as well as tests of motor and sensory ability. In general, as compared to wild type control mice, within-group variability was high in the Tg2576 mice, and deficits were most apparent in more complex discrimination tasks. Furthermore, a consistent decrease in the rate at which Tg2576 mice completed testing trials was observed, pointing to a potential motivation difference or speed-accuracy tradeoffs as a defining characteristic of this strain under these test conditions. Using sensitive adjusting retention interval procedures, it was also possible to isolate a difference in retention interval and separate it from non-mnemonic processes. Overall, these experiments demonstrate the utility of this novel operant approach for characterizing the cognitive deficits of transgenic murine models of dementia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.