Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21763736›Full record

ArticleJournal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society2011

Brain tumor targeting of magnetic nanoparticles for potential drug delivery: effect of administration route and magnetic field topography.

Beata Chertok, Allan E David, Victor C Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Real-time monitoring of magnetic drug targeting using fibered confocal fluorescence microscopy.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Beata ChertokDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Allan E David
Victor C Yang

Funding

PTD-Mediated Protein or Drug Delivery for Cancer TherapyR01CA114612 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI YANG, VICTOR C · 2005 to 2015
$2.5M
MION for Synchronized MRI and Drug Therapy of Brain TumorR01NS066945 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI YANG, VICTOR C · 2009 to 2010
$770k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA114612NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS066945
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our previous studies demonstrated feasibility of magnetically-mediated retention of iron oxide nanoparticles in brain tumors after intravascular administration. The purpose of this study was to elucidate strategies for further improvement of this promising approach. In particular, we explored administration of the nanoparticles via a non-occluded carotid artery as a way to increase the passive exposure of tumor vasculature to nanoparticles for subsequent magnetic entrapment. However, aggregation of nanoparticles in the afferent vasculature interfered with tumor targeting. The magnetic setup employed in our experiments was found to generate a relatively uniform magnetic flux density over a broad range, exposing the region of the afferent vasculature to high magnetic force. To overcome this problem, the magnetic setup was modified with a 9-mm diameter cylindrical NdFeB magnet to exhibit steeper magnetic field topography. Six-fold reduction of the magnetic force at the injection site, achieved with this modification, alleviated the aggregation problem under the conditions of intact carotid blood flow. Using this setup, carotid administration was found to present 1.8-fold increase in nanoparticle accumulation in glioma compared to the intravenous route at 350mT. This increase was found to be in reasonable agreement with the theoretically estimated 1.9-fold advantage of carotid administration, R(d). The developed approach is expected to present an even greater advantage when applied to drug-loaded nanoparticles exhibiting higher values of R(d).

Indexed as

Electromagnetic FieldsAnimalsBrain MappingBrain NeoplasmsCarotid ArteriesCell Line, TumorDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug CarriersFerric CompoundsGliomaInjections, Intra-ArterialInjections, IntravenousMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNanoparticlesNeoplasm TransplantationDrug CarriersFerric Compoundsferric oxide

Identifiers

PMID21763736
PMCPMC3196033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.