Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21763423›Full record

ReviewBiochimica et biophysica acta2011

Gene delivery in salivary glands: from the bench to the clinic.

Yuval Samuni, Bruce J Baum

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochimica et biophysica acta, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Journal of clinical medicine · 2020
    Review
  11. Harnessing biomolecules for bioinspired dental biomaterials.Journal of materials chemistry. B · 2020
    Review
  12. Review
  13. The Role of Medicine and Technology in Shaping the Future of Oral Health.Journal of the California Dental Association · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Retroductal Nanoparticle Injection to the Murine Submandibular Gland.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2018
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Regenerative medicine and cell-based approaches to restore pancreatic function.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2017
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yuval SamuniDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Barzilai Medical Center, Ashkelon, Israel.
Bruce J Baum

Funding

Salivary Gland Secretion Mechanisms During Normal And Altered Functional StatesZIADE000336 · NIDCR · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH · PI BAUM, BRUCE J · 2009 to 2011
$5.9M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA DE000336
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vivo gene delivery has long been seen as providing opportunities for the development of novel treatments for disorders refractory to existing therapies. Over the last two decades, salivary glands have proven to be a useful, if somewhat unconventional, target tissue for studying several potential clinical applications of therapeutic gene delivery. Herein, we follow the progress, address some problems and assess the outlook for clinical applications of salivary gland gene delivery. Our experience with these tissues provides a roadmap for the process of moving an idea from the laboratory bench to patients.

Indexed as

Genetic TherapyAnimalsDrug Delivery SystemsGenetic VectorsGene Transfer TechniquesHumansRadiation InjuriesSalivary Glands

Identifiers

PMID21763423
PMCPMC3185128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.