Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21763118›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in immunology2011

The impact of aging on cancer vaccination.

Claudia Gravekamp

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in immunology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Science translational medicine · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Claudia GravekampAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Forchheimer Bldg, Room 407A, Bronx, NY 10461, USA. claudia.gravekamp@einstein.yu.edu
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · US

Funding

DNA vaccines for metastatic breat cancer at old ageR01AG023096 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR SAN ANT · PI GRAVEKAMP, CLAUDIA · 2004 to 2010
$1.2M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG023096
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer vaccination is less effective at old than at young age, due to T cell unresponsiveness, caused by various age-related changes of the immune system. This includes lack of naïve T cells, defects in activation pathways of T cells and antigen-presenting cells (APC), and age-related changes in the tumor microenvironment. Although evidence exists that also natural killer (NK) and natural killer T (NKT) cells of the innate immune system change with age, comparison of various studies involving adaptive and innate immune responses in elderly and cancer patients, as well as cancer vaccination at young and old age in this review, indicates that also innate immune responses should be tested as a potential candidate to improve immunotherapy against cancer at older age.

Indexed as

VaccinationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAgingAnimalsCancer VaccinesCD28 AntigensDendritic CellsFemaleGene Rearrangement, T-LymphocyteHumansImmunity, InnateImmunotherapy, ActiveKiller Cells, NaturalLymphokinesCancer VaccinesCD28 AntigensLymphokinesReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, alpha-betaVaccines, DNA

Identifiers

PMID21763118
PMCPMC4052947
OpenAlexW2013116460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.