Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21762762›Full record

ArticleGene2011

The evolution of MDM2 family genes.

Jamil Momand, Alberto Villegas, Vladimir A Belyi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gene, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Exon 3 of theG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Role of MDM2 in Promoting Genome Stability versus Instability.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Evolution of the p53-MDM2 pathway.BMC evolutionary biology · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Anatomy of Mdm2 and Mdm4 in evolution.Journal of molecular cell biology · 2017
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jamil MomandDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, California State University Los Angeles, 90032, USA. jmomand@calstatela.edu
Alberto Villegas
Vladimir A Belyi
California State University Los Angeles · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Research Initiative for Scientific Enhancement (RISE)R25GM061331 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LOS ANGELES · PI FOSTER, KRISHNA L · 2000 to 2021
$33.1M
UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT TRAINING IN ACADEMIC RESEARCHT34GM008228 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LOS ANGELES · PI TUNSTAD, LINDA M. · 1986 to 2022
$13.3M
CSULA-COH Collaborative to Study Cancer DisparitiesP20CA118783 · NCI · CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LOS ANGELES · PI MOMAND, JAMIL A · 2006 to 2009
$907k
NCI NIH HHS 1 P20 CA118783NCI NIH HHS P20 CA118783NIGMS NIH HHS 5T34GM008228-25NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM061331NIGMS NIH HHS T34 GM008228
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MDM2 and MDM4 are proto-oncoproteins that bind to and inhibit members of the p53 protein family, p53, p73 and possibly p63. p53 is a mammalian tumor suppressor and p63 and p73 are critical for development. With the sequencing of genomes from multiple organisms there is mounting evidence for a consensus scenario of p53 gene family evolution. A single p53/p63/p73 gene is in invertebrates and required for maintenance of germline DNA. Gene duplication occurred in an ancestor in common with cartilaginous fishes, giving rise to a separate p53 gene and at least one ancestral p63/p73 gene. In bony vertebrates, all three p53 gene family paralogs, p53, p63, and p73 are distinct genes. This raises the question of how MDM2 and MDM4 genes evolved. We show evidence that MDM2 and MDM4 arose from a gene duplication event prior to the emergence of bony vertebrates more than 440 millionyears ago. Comparative genome studies indicate that invertebrate organisms have only one MDM homolog. In jawed vertebrates, the p53-binding domains of MDM2 and MDM4 proteins evolved at a high rate, approaching the evolution rate of the MDM2-binding domain of p53. However, the MDM2-binding domain of p73 exhibits markedly stronger conservation suggesting novel p53-independent functions. The most conserved domain within all MDM2 family members is the RING domain of the MDM2 ortholog which is responsible for ubiquitination of p53 and heterodimerization with MDM4. We suggest a model where oligomerization is an ancient function of MDM and ubiquitination activity was acquired later near the MDM gene duplication event coinciding with the time of the emergence of p53 as a distinct gene.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsCell Cycle ProteinsConserved SequenceGene DuplicationGenes, p53Genetic VariationHumansInvertebratesMultigene FamilyNuclear ProteinsProtein Structure, TertiaryProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2Proto-OncogenesTime FactorsCell Cycle ProteinsMDM2 protein, humanMDM4 protein, humanNuclear ProteinsProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2

Identifiers

PMID21762762
PMCPMC3162079
OpenAlexW1968092675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.