Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21762752›Full record

ArticleVaccine2011

Chimeric severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) S glycoprotein and influenza matrix 1 efficiently form virus-like particles (VLPs) that protect mice against challenge with SARS-CoV.

Ye V Liu, Michael J Massare, Dale L Barnard, Thomas Kort, Margret Nathan, Lei Wang, Gale Smith

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05249816 (An Observer-Blinded Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of a Single Booster of the NVX-CoV2373 Vaccine in Adults Previously Vaccinated With the BBIBP-CorV Vaccine), which is not on this map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 100% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05249816 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

An Observer-Blinded Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of a Single Booster of the NVX-CoV2373 Vaccine in Adults Previously Vaccinated With the BBIBP-CorV Vaccine

TypeinterventionalSponsorCogna Technology Solutions LLCRan2022 to 2023Enrolled1,000ConditionsSevere Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)ArmsNVX-CoV2373, BBIBP-CorV vaccine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. A comparison between SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV2: an update on current COVID-19 vaccines.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Engineered nanomaterials as fighters against SARS-CoV-2: The way to control and treat pandemics.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ye V LiuNovavax Inc., 9920 Belward Campus Drive, Rockville, MD 20850, United States. yliu@novavax.com
Michael J Massare
Dale L Barnard
Thomas Kort
Margret Nathan
Lei Wang
Gale Smith
Novavax (United States) · US

Funding

Development of Recombinant SARS VLP VaccinesU01AI061988 · NIAID · NOVAVAX, INC. · PI SMITH, GALE · 2005 to 2007
$1.0M
NIAID NIH HHS 1U03AI06198801NIAID NIH HHS N01-AI-15345NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI061988
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SARS-CoV was the cause of the global pandemic in 2003 that infected over 8000 people in 8 months. Vaccines against SARS are still not available. We developed a novel method to produce high levels of a recombinant SARS virus-like particles (VLPs) vaccine containing the SARS spike (S) protein and the influenza M1 protein using the baculovirus insect cell expression system. These chimeric SARS VLPs have a similar size and morphology to the wild type SARS-CoV. We tested the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of purified chimeric SARS VLPs and full length SARS S protein vaccines in a mouse lethal challenge model. The SARS VLP vaccine, containing 0.8 μg of SARS S protein, completely protected mice from death when administered intramuscular (IM) or intranasal (IN) routes in the absence of an adjuvant. Likewise, the SARS VLP vaccine, containing 4 μg of S protein without adjuvant, reduced lung virus titer to below detectable level, protected mice from weight loss, and elicited a high level of neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV. Sf9 cell-produced full length purified SARS S protein was also an effective vaccine against SARS-CoV but only when co-administered IM with aluminum hydroxide. SARS-CoV VLPs are highly immunogenic and induce neutralizing antibodies and provide protection against lethal challenge. Sf9 cell-based VLP vaccines are a potential tool to provide protection against novel pandemic agents.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAluminum HydroxideAnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralBaculoviridaeBody WeightDisease Models, AnimalFemaleGenetic VectorsInsectaLungMembrane GlycoproteinsMiceMice, Inbred BALB CProtein MultimerizationAdjuvants, ImmunologicAluminum HydroxideAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralM1 protein, Influenza A virusMembrane GlycoproteinsRecombinant ProteinsSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike glycoprotein, SARS-CoVspike protein, mouse hepatitis virusVaccines, VirosomeViral Envelope ProteinsViral Matrix ProteinsViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID21762752
PMCPMC3165014
OpenAlexW6047510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.