Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21762142›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2011

Provision of fluoride varnish to Medicaid-enrolled children by physicians: the Massachusetts experience.

Inyang A Isong, Hugh Silk, Sowmya R Rao, James M Perrin, Judith A Savageau, Karen Donelan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Inyang A IsongHarvard Medical School, Center for Child and Adolescent Health Policy, Massachusetts General Hospitalfor Children, Boston, MA 02114, USA. iisong@partners.org
Hugh Silk
Sowmya R Rao
James M Perrin
Judith A Savageau
Karen Donelan

Funding

PHS HHS T32 HP10018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the impact of a 2008 Medicaid policy in Massachusetts (MA), regarding reimbursing physicians for providing fluoride varnish (FV) to eligible children in medical settings. DATA SOURCE: Survey of a sample of primary care physicians in MA. STUDY

designCross-sectional survey of a sample of physicians who provide care to MassHealth (MA Medicaid) enrolled-children. DEPENDENT VARIABLES: history of completed preventive dental skills training, and FV provision. INDEPENDENT VARIABLES: oral health knowledge, FV-attitudes, and physician and practice characteristics. PRINCIPAL

findingsOverall, 19 percent of respondents had completed the training required to be eligible to bill for FV provision. Only 5 percent of physicians were providing FV. Most respondents (63 percent) were not familiar with the new policy, and only 25 percent felt that FV should be provided during well-child visits. Most physicians (60 percent) did not feel that the reimbursement rate of U.S.$26/application was sufficient; 17 percent said that they would not provide FV, regardless of payment. Most common barriers to FV provision were a lack of time and logistical challenges.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that simply reimbursing physicians for FV provision is insufficient to ensure provider participation. Success of this policy will likely require addressing several barriers identified.

Indexed as

Fluorides, TopicalHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInsurance, Health, ReimbursementMassachusettsMedicaidOral HygienePhysicians, Primary CareUnited StatesFluorides, Topical

Identifiers

PMID21762142
PMCPMC3393025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.