ArticleApplied health economics and health policy2011
Nutrition therapy cost analysis in the US: pre-mixed multi-chamber bag vs compounded parenteral nutrition.
Article in Applied health economics and health policy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Efficacy, Safety, and Preparation of Standardized Parenteral Nutrition Regimens: Three-Chamber Bags vs Compounded Monobags-A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Single-Blind Clinical Trial.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2017Trial
- Safety and efficacy of an olive oil-based triple-chamber bag for parenteral nutrition: a prospective, randomized, multi-center clinical trial in China.Nutrition journal · 2015Trial
- AI Guided Parenteral Nutrition Therapy After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Access, equity, and innovation in the management of the open abdomen: the lack of proper treatment and the impact in low-income populations.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2026Article
- Distraction Enterogenesis in Rats: A Novel Approach for the Treatment of Short Bowel Syndrome.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2024Article
- The Rate of Discontinuing Ready-to-Use Multi-Chamber Bag Parenteral Nutrition Secondary to High Serum Electrolyte Levels.Hospital pharmacy · 2023Article
- Cost-effectiveness of teduglutide in pediatric patients with short bowel syndrome: Markov modeling using traditional cost-effectiveness criteria.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2021Article
- Cost-effectiveness of teduglutide in adult patients with short bowel syndrome: Markov modeling using traditional cost-effectiveness criteria.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2020Article
- Premixed vs Compounded Parenteral Nutrition: Effects of Total Parenteral Nutrition Shortage on Clinical Practice.Current nutrition reports · 2019Review
- Medical Nutrition Therapy in Critically Ill Patients Treated on Intensive and Intermediate Care Units: A Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Review
- The Effect of Individualized Versus Standardized Parenteral Nutrition on Body Weight in Very Preterm Infants.Journal of clinical medicine research · 2017Article
- Significant Published Articles for Pharmacy Nutrition Support Practice in 2014 and 2015.Hospital pharmacy · 2016Article
- Use of Piggyback Electrolytes for Patients Receiving Individually Prescribed vs Premixed Parenteral Nutrition.JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition · 2015Article
- The impact of parenteral nutrition preparation on bloodstream infection risk and costs.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2014Article
- Composition of personalized and standard nutritional mixtures in patients on home parenteral nutrition.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2014Article
- Early parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients with short-term relative contraindications to early enteral nutrition: a full economic analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial based on US costs.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2013Article
- Premixed Parenteral Nutrition Solution Use in Children.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAGArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBloodstream infections (BSI) occur in up to 350 000 inpatient admissions each year in the US, with BSI rates among patients receiving parenteral nutrition (PN) varying from 1.3% to 39%. BSI-attributable costs were estimated to approximate $US12 000 per episode in 2000. While previous studies have compared the cost of different PN preparation methods, this analysis evaluates both the direct costs of PN and the treatment costs for BSI associated with different PN delivery methods to determine whether compounded or manufactured pre-mixed PN has lower overall costs.
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to compare costs in the US associated with compounded PN versus pre-mixed multi-chamber bag (MCB) PN based on underlying infection risk.
methodsUsing claims information from the Premier Perspective™ database, multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate the risk of infection. A total of 44 358 hospitalized patients aged ≥18 years who received PN between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2007 were included in the analyses. A total of 3256 patients received MCB PN and 41 102 received compounded PN. The PN-associated costs and length of stay were analysed using multivariate ordinary least squares regression models constructed to measure the impact of infectious events on total hospital costs after controlling for baseline and clinical patient characteristics.
resultsThere were 7.3 additional hospital days attributable to BSI. After adjustment for baseline variables, the probability of developing a BSI was 30% higher in patients receiving compounded PN than in those receiving MCB PN (16.1% vs 11.3%; odds ratio = 1.56; 95% CI 1.37, 1.79; p < 0.0001), demonstrating 2172 potentially avoidable infections. The observed daily mean PN acquisition cost for patients receiving MCB PN was $US164 (including all additives and fees) compared with $US239 for patients receiving compounded PN (all differences p < 0.001). With a mean cost attributable to BSI of $US16 141, the total per-patient savings (including avoided BSI and PN costs) was $US1545.
conclusionIn this analysis of real-world PN use, MCB PN is associated with lower costs than compounded PN with regards to both PN acquisition and potential avoidance of BSI. Our base case indicates that $US1545 per PN patient may be saved; even if as few as 50% of PN patients are candidates for standardized pre-mix formulations, a potential savings of $US773 per patient may be realized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.