ArticleHormones & cancer2010
The relationship between hormone therapy use at the time of diagnosis of breast cancer and tumor characteristics.
Article in Hormones & cancer, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Exposure to postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) may affect the stage, histological type, and hormone receptor (HR) status of invasive breast cancer at the time of diagnosis. One thousand six hundred eighty-four women with newly diagnosed first invasive breast cancer were recruited to the "MBF Foundation Health and Wellbeing after Breast Cancer Study." Women using systemic HT estrogen (E) or E combined with progesterone (P) at the time of diagnosis of breast cancer were compared with those not using HT. Breast cancer tumor data were obtained from the Victorian Cancer Registry. Regression analysis was used to determine the associations between HT use or not at the time of diagnosis and tumor histology (ductal vs lobular), stage (I vs II, III, IV), HR status (ER+ or PR+ or both vs ER- or PR-). Of 1,377 women included in the analysis, 226 (16%) were using HT at the time of diagnosis. Of HT users, 20.4% had lobular breast cancer, 50% were stage I, and 85.8% had HR-positive tumors. Of non-users, 13.6% had lobular breast cancer, 48.2% were stage I, and 82.4% had HR-positive tumors. Use of systemic HT was associated with increased odds of having lobular compared with ductal breast cancer (OR = 1.75, 95% CI = 1.14-2.69, p = 0.01). There were no associations between HT use and either breast cancer stage or HR status. Women using systemic HT at the time of diagnosis were more likely to have lobular rather than ductal breast cancer compared with women not on HT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.