Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21761252›Full record

Trial reportClinical orthopaedics and related research2011

Hypesthesia after anterolateral versus midline skin incision in TKA: a randomized study.

Jean-Michel Laffosse, Anna Potapov, Michel Malo, Martin Lavigne, Pascal-André Vendittoli

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06050473 (Preservation vs Sacrifice of the Supraclavicular Nerve During Clavicle ORIF), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06050473 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Preservation vs Sacrifice of the Supraclavicular Nerve During Clavicle ORIF: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHealthPartners InstituteRan2016 to 2023Enrolled45ConditionsClavicle FractureArmsNerve-sacrificing procedure, Nerve preserving procedure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. A prospective randomized study in 20 patients undergoing bilateral TKA comparing midline incision to anterolateral incision.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2017
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Excellent results of restricted kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty at a minimum of 10 years of follow-up.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. SKINTED: an uncommon cutaneous complication of total knee replacement.American journal of neurodegenerative disease · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. The effect of numbness on outcome from total knee replacement.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Jean-Michel LaffosseDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rangueil Hospital Center, Toulouse, France.
Anna Potapov
Michel Malo
Martin Lavigne
Pascal-André Vendittoli
Université de Montréal · CAHôpital Rangueil · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe anterior midline skin incision in a TKA provides excellent surgical exposure. However, it usually requires sectioning the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve which may be associated with lateral cutaneous hypesthesia and neuroma formation. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked whether an anterolateral skin incision to the knee would decrease the area of skin hypesthesia and associated postoperative discomfort. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe randomized 69 knees to receive a TKA through either a midline or an anterolateral skin incision. We assessed skin sensitivity by application of the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament at 13 reference points at 6 weeks and 6 and 12 months postoperatively. The area of hypesthesia was measured using Mesurim Pro 9(®) software. Patient knee ROM, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and WOMAC clinical score also were assessed.

resultsThe area of hypesthesia was less after an anterolateral compared with a midline incision up to 1 year after surgery: the areas of hypesthesia were, respectively, 32 cm(2) versus 76 cm(2) at 6 weeks, 14 cm(2) versus 29 cm(2) at 6 months, and 7 cm(2) versus 19 cm(2) at 1 year. Clinical scores and knee ROM were similar in both groups at each followup. At 1 year, in the entire group we observed a correlation between a smaller area of paresthesia and better WOMAC and KOOS scores and greater knee flexion.

conclusionsCompared with the midline skin incision, the anterolateral incision is associated with fewer sensory disturbances and appears to be a reasonable alternative in TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic study. See the guidelines for authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Indexed as

Intraoperative ComplicationsAgedArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeDisability EvaluationFemaleHealth StatusHumansHyperesthesiaKnee InjuriesKnee JointMaleOsteoarthritis, KneePostoperative ComplicationsRange of Motion, ArticularRecovery of Function

Identifiers

PMID21761252
PMCPMC3183179
OpenAlexW1969814202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.