ArticleExperimental & applied acarology2011
A sensitive bioassay for spider mite (Tetranychus urticae) repellency: a double bond makes a difference.
Article in Experimental & applied acarology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of statistical models for time-dependent repellency using the novel Pole-dance bioassay against Tetranychus urticae Koch.Experimental & applied acarology · 2025Article
- The Alcohol and Epoxy Alcohol of Zingiberene, Produced in Trichomes of Wild Tomato, Are More Repellent to Spider Mites Than Zingiberene.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Article
- Repellent and Attractive Effects of α-, β-, and Dihydro-β- Ionone to Generalist and Specialist Herbivores.Journal of chemical ecology · 2016Article
- From Chemistry to Behavior. Molecular Structure and Bioactivity of Repellents against Ixodes ricinus Ticks.PloS one · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Choice bioassays were used to determine repellency of homologous n-alkanes (C(8)H(18)-C(21)H(44)) to spider mites. When tested at 400 μg/cm(2), the C(15)-C(19) alkanes were highly repellent; the C(16) n-alkane, n-hexadecane, was most repellent. Subsequently the EC(50) values, the concentration at which 50% of the mites were repelled, were determined for the C(15)-C(19) n-alkanes and their analogous 1-n-alkenes (C(15)H(30)-C(19)H(38)). The EC(50) value for 1-heptadecene, the C(17) 1-n-alkene, was the lowest observed. Except for the 17-carbon hydrocarbons, the EC(50) values for the n-alkanes were less than those for their analogous 1-n-alkenes. Depending on the compounds evaluated, there was as much as a six-fold difference of repellency between an n-alkane its analogous 1-n-alkene. Thus, the bioassay has sufficient sensitivity to detect behavioral differences associated with the presence or absence of a single double bond. The EC(50) values for the most repellent hydrocarbons were similar to that reported for 2,3-dihydrofarnesoic acid, a naturally occurring repellent isolated from trichome secretions of a wild tomato, Solanum habrochaites, and also were similar to concentrations used to evaluate arthropod repellents. Consequently, this bioassay may be useful for providing a better understanding of the relationships between structures and activities of natural products that are repellent to spider mites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.