Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21760945›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Resistance to the CCR5 inhibitor 5P12-RANTES requires a difficult evolution from CCR5 to CXCR4 coreceptor use.

Rebecca Nedellec, Mia Coetzer, Michael M Lederman, Robin E Offord, Oliver Hartley, Donald E Mosier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Endogenous Peptide Inhibitors of HIV Entry.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. CCR5 Inhibitors and HIV-1 Infection.Journal of AIDS and HIV treatment · 2019
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Peptide and protein-based inhibitors of HIV-1 co-receptors.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2013
    Review
  20. Prospects for treatment of latent HIV.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Rebecca NedellecDepartment of Immunology and Microbial Science, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Mia Coetzer
Michael M Lederman
Robin E Offord
Oliver Hartley
Donald E Mosier
Scripps Research Institute · USCase Western Reserve University · USMintaka Foundation for Medical Research · CHUniversity of Geneva · CH

Funding

Developing RANTES analogues as topical strategies to prevent HIV transmissionU19AI076981 · NIAID · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI LEDERMAN, MICHAEL MARCEL · 2008 to 2010
$5.7M
HIV CORECEPTOR SWITCHINGR01AI052778 · NIAID · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI MOSIER, DONALD E · 2003 to 2010
$3.8M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI052778NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI076981
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Viral resistance to small molecule allosteric inhibitors of CCR5 is well documented, and involves either selection of preexisting CXCR4-using HIV-1 variants or envelope sequence evolution to use inhibitor-bound CCR5 for entry. Resistance to macromolecular CCR5 inhibitors has been more difficult to demonstrate, although selection of CXCR4-using variants might be expected. We have compared the in vitro selection of HIV-1 CC1/85 variants resistant to either the small molecule inhibitor maraviroc (MVC) or the macromolecular inhibitor 5P12-RANTES. High level resistance to MVC was conferred by the same envelope mutations as previously reported after 16-18 weeks of selection by increasing levels of MVC. The MVC-resistant mutants were fully sensitive to inhibition by 5P12-RANTES. By contrast, only transient and low level resistance to 5P12-RANTES was achieved in three sequential selection experiments, and each resulted in a subsequent collapse of virus replication. A fourth round of selection by 5P12-RANTES led, after 36 weeks, to a "resistant" variant that had switched from CCR5 to CXCR4 as a coreceptor. Envelope sequences diverged by 3.8% during selection of the 5P12-RANTES resistant, CXCR4-using variants, with unique and critical substitutions in the V3 region. A subset of viruses recovered from control cultures after 44 weeks of passage in the absence of inhibitors also evolved to use CXCR4, although with fewer and different envelope mutations. Control cultures contained both viruses that evolved to use CXCR4 by deleting four amino acids in V3, and others that maintained entry via CCR5. These results suggest that coreceptor switching may be the only route to resistance for compounds like 5P12-RANTES. This pathway requires more mutations and encounters more fitness obstacles than development of resistance to MVC, confirming the clinical observations that resistance to small molecule CCR5 inhibitors very rarely involves coreceptor switching.

Indexed as

CCR5 Receptor AntagonistsDirected Molecular EvolutionAmino Acid SequenceChemokines, CCCyclohexanesDrug Resistance, ViralHIV-1HIV Envelope Protein gp160HumansMaravirocMolecular Sequence DataReceptors, CCR5Receptors, CXCR4TriazolesVirus Replication5P12-RANTESCCR5 Receptor AntagonistsChemokines, CCCyclohexanesHIV Envelope Protein gp160MaravirocReceptors, CCR5Receptors, CXCR4Triazoles

Identifiers

PMID21760945
PMCPMC3132774
OpenAlexW2075606608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.