Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21760933›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

[PSI+] maintenance is dependent on the composition, not primary sequence, of the oligopeptide repeat domain.

James A Toombs, Nathan M Liss, Kacy R Cobble, Zobaida Ben-Musa, Eric D Ross

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. How Big Is the Yeast Prion Universe?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Anti-prion systems in yeast.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2019
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Yeast and Fungal Prions.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2016
    Review
  9. Generating new prions by targeted mutation or segment duplication.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Yeast prions: structure, biology, and prion-handling systems.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2015
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Prions in yeast.Genetics · 2012
    Review
  20. De novo design of synthetic prion domains.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James A ToombsDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
Nathan M Liss
Kacy R Cobble
Zobaida Ben-Musa
Eric D Ross
Colorado State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

[PSI(+)], the prion form of the yeast Sup35 protein, results from the structural conversion of Sup35 from a soluble form into an infectious amyloid form. The infectivity of prions is thought to result from chaperone-dependent fiber cleavage that breaks large prion fibers into smaller, inheritable propagons. Like the mammalian prion protein PrP, Sup35 contains an oligopeptide repeat domain. Deletion analysis indicates that the oligopeptide repeat domain is critical for [PSI(+)] propagation, while a distinct region of the prion domain is responsible for prion nucleation. The PrP oligopeptide repeat domain can substitute for the Sup35 oligopeptide repeat domain in supporting [PSI(+)] propagation, suggesting a common role for repeats in supporting prion maintenance. However, randomizing the order of the amino acids in the Sup35 prion domain does not block prion formation or propagation, suggesting that amino acid composition is the primary determinant of Sup35's prion propensity. Thus, it is unclear what role the oligopeptide repeats play in [PSI(+)] propagation: the repeats could simply act as a non-specific spacer separating the prion nucleation domain from the rest of the protein; the repeats could contain specific compositional elements that promote prion propagation; or the repeats, while not essential for prion propagation, might explain some unique features of [PSI(+)]. Here, we test these three hypotheses and show that the ability of the Sup35 and PrP repeats to support [PSI(+)] propagation stems from their amino acid composition, not their primary sequences. Furthermore, we demonstrate that compositional requirements for the repeat domain are distinct from those of the nucleation domain, indicating that prion nucleation and propagation are driven by distinct compositional features.

Indexed as

Repetitive Sequences, Amino AcidAmino Acid SequenceHeat-Shock ProteinsMolecular Sequence DataMutant ProteinsOligopeptidesPeptide Termination FactorsPrionsProtein Structure, TertiaryRecombinant Fusion ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsHeat-Shock ProteinsHsP104 protein, S cerevisiaeMutant ProteinsOligopeptidesPeptide Termination FactorsPrionsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSUP35 protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID21760933
PMCPMC3132755
OpenAlexW1974694838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.