ArticleInternational journal of biomaterials2011
Biphasic calcium phosphate bioceramics for orthopaedic reconstructions: clinical outcomes.
Article in International journal of biomaterials, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- The acute inflammatory response to copper(II)-doped biphasic calcium phosphates.Materials today. Bio · 2023Article
- Evaluation of the clinical and radiographic effectiveness of treating peri-implant bone defects with a new biphasic calcium phosphate bone graft: a prospective, multicenter randomized controlled trial.Journal of periodontal & implant science · 2023Article
- Restoring Facial Contour and Harmony Using Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Bioceramics.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2021Article
- The outcome of biphasic calcium phosphate bone substitute in a medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2020Article
- Hydroxyethyl Chitosan-Reinforced Polyvinyl Alcohol/Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Hydrogels for Bone Regeneration.ACS omega · 2020Article
- Advancements and frontiers in nano-based 3D and 4D scaffolds for bone and cartilage tissue engineering.International journal of nanomedicine · 2019Review
- Bone Marrow-Derived CD44Stem cells international · 2019Article
- Promoting proliferation and differentiation of BMSCs by green tea polyphenols functionalized porous calcium phosphate.Regenerative biomaterials · 2018Article
- Bone regeneration using a porcine bone substitute collagen composite in vitro and in vivo.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Enhancement of Osteoblastic-Like Cell Activity by Glow Discharge Plasma Surface Modified Hydroxyapatite/β-Tricalcium Phosphate Bone Substitute.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Article
- Response of stem cells from different origins to biphasic calcium phosphate bioceramics.Cell and tissue research · 2015Article
- Alendronate-Eluting Biphasic Calcium Phosphate (BCP) Scaffolds Stimulate Osteogenic Differentiation.BioMed research international · 2015Article
- Comparison of the long-term effects on rabbit bone defects between Tetrabone and β-tricalcium phosphate granules implantation.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2014Article
- Bone regeneration of calvarial defect using marine calcareous-derived beta-tricalcium phosphate macrospheres.Journal of tissue engineering · 2014Article
- Pullulan/dextran/nHA macroporous composite beads for bone repair in a femoral condyle defect in rats.PloS one · 2014Article
- Current application of β-tricalcium phosphate composites in orthopaedics.Orthopaedic surgery · 2012Review
- Poly (Methyl Methacrylate)/Biphasic Calcium Phosphate/Nano Graphene Bone Cement for Orthopedic Application.Journal of medical signals and sensorsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BCP are considered the most promising biomaterials for bone reconstruction. This study aims at analyzing the outcomes of patients who received BCP as bone substitutes in orthopaedic surgeries. Sixty-six patients were categorized according to the etiology and morphology of the bone defects and received scores after clinical and radiographic evaluations. The final results corresponded to the combination of both parameters and varied from 5 (excellent result) to 2 or lower (poor result). Most of the patients who presented cavitary defects or bone losses due to prosthesis placement or revision, osteotomies, or arthrodesis showed good results, and some of them excellent results. However, patients with segmental defects equal or larger than 3 cm in length were classified as moderate results. This study established clinical parameters where the BCP alone can successfully support the osteogenic process and where the association with other tissue engineering strategies may be considered.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.