Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21760722›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2011

Delivery characteristics and patients' handling of two single-dose dry-powder inhalers used in COPD.

Kenneth R Chapman, Charles M Fogarty, Clare Peckitt, Cheryl Lassen, Dalal Jadayel, Juergen Dederichs, Mukul Dalvi, Benjamin Kramer

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Bronchodilator efficacy of 18 μg once-daily tiotropium inhalation via DiscairInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2016
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Usability of inhaler devices: a parameter currently misused.Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Journal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kenneth R ChapmanAsthma and Airway Centre, University Health Network, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. kchapman@ca.inter.net
Charles M Fogarty
Clare Peckitt
Cheryl Lassen
Dalal Jadayel
Juergen Dederichs
Mukul Dalvi
Benjamin Kramer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For optimal efficacy, an inhaler should deliver doses consistently and be easy for patients to use with minimal instruction. The delivery characteristics, patients' correct use, and preference of two single-dose dry powder inhalers (Breezhaler and HandiHaler) were evaluated in two complementary studies. The first study examined aerodynamic particle size distribution, using inhalation profiles of seven patients with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The second was an open-label, two-period, 7-day crossover study, evaluating use of the inhalers with placebo capsules by 82 patients with mild to severe COPD. Patients' correct use of the inhalers was assessed after reading written instructions on Day 1, and after training and 7 days of daily use. Patients' preference was assessed after completion of both study periods. Patient inhalation profiles showed average peak inspiratory flows of 72 L/minute through Breezhaler and 36 L/minute through HandiHaler. For Breezhaler and HandiHaler, fine particle fractions were 27% and 10%, respectively. In the second study, correct use of Breezhaler and HandiHaler was achieved by > 77% of patients for any step after 7 days; 61% of patients showed an overall preference for Breezhaler and 31% for HandiHaler (P = 0.01).Breezhaler is a low-resistance inhaler suitable for use by patients with a range of disease severities. Most patients used both inhalers correctly after 7 days, but more patients showed an overall preference for the Breezhaler compared with the HandiHaler. These are important factors for optimum dose delivery and successful COPD management.

Indexed as

Dry Powder InhalersAdministration, InhalationAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsAdultAerosolsAgedBronchodilator AgentsCanadaCholinergic AntagonistsCross-Over StudiesEquipment DesignFemaleHumansIndansInhalationLungAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsAerosolsBronchodilator AgentsCholinergic AntagonistsindacaterolIndansQuinolonesScopolamine DerivativesTiotropium BromideBreezhalerCOPDdose deliveryHandiHalerpreferenceuse

Identifiers

PMID21760722
PMCPMC3133507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.