Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21757448›Full record

ArticleGut2012

Upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage and deprivation: a nationwide cohort study of health inequality in hospital admissions.

Colin J Crooks, Joe West, Tim R Card

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Gut, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Acquired Refractory Iron Deficiency Anemia.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Socioeconomic status and anterior epistaxis in adult population.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Should we enhance the commonly used deprivation index for a regional context?Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2013
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Colin J CrooksDivision of Epidemiology and Public Health, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, UK. colin.crooks@nottingham.ac.uk
Joe West
Tim R Card
University of Nottingham · GBQueen's Medical Centre · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveInequalities in health are well recognized in cardiovascular disease and cancer, but in comparison, we have minimal understanding for upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Since furthering our understanding of such inequality signposts preventable disease, we investigated in detail the association between upper gastrointestinal bleeding and socioeconomic status.

designPopulation-based cohort study.

settingAll English National Health Service hospitals. POPULATION: English adult population, 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2007. EXPOSURE MEASURES: Deprivation scores defined according to quintiles of neighbourhood areas ranked by the Indices of Multiple Deprivation for England 2007. OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of all adult admissions coded with a primary diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal bleed were analysed by deprivation quintile and adjusted for age, sex, region and year using Poisson regression.

resultsThe annual hospitalization rate for non-variceal haemorrhage was 84.6 per 100,000 population (95% CI 83.5 to 84.1; n=237,145), and for variceal haemorrhage, it was 2.83 per 100,000 population (95% CI 2.87 to 2.99; n=8291). There was a twofold increase in the hospitalization rate ratio for non-variceal haemorrhage from the most deprived areas compared to the least deprived (2.00, 95% CI 1.98 to 2.03). The ratio for variceal haemorrhage was even more pronounced (2.49, 95% CI 2.32 to 2.67). Inequality increased over the study period (non-variceal p<0.0001, variceal p=0.0068), and adjusting for age and sex increased the disparity between deprived and affluent areas. Case fatality did not have a similar socioeconomic gradient.

conclusionBoth variceal and non-variceal haemorrhage hospitalization rates increased with deprivation, and there was a similar gradient in all areas of the country and in all age bands. The existence of such a steep gradient suggests that there are opportunities to reduce hospitalizations down to the low rates seen in the most affluent, and thus, there is the potential to prevent almost 10,000 admissions and over 1000 deaths a year.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesPoverty AreasSocial ClassAdolescentAdultAgedAge DistributionCohort StudiesDuodenal UlcerEnglandEsophageal and Gastric VaricesFemaleGastroenteritisGastrointestinal HemorrhageGastrointestinal NeoplasmsHospitalization

Identifiers

PMID21757448
PMCPMC3292712
OpenAlexW2160047328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.