ArticleNeurological research2011
The efficacy of carmustine wafers for older patients with glioblastoma multiforme: prolonging survival.
Article in Neurological research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- Congress of neurological surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines update on the role of chemotherapeutic management and antiangiogenic treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma in adults.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Survival outcomes and safety of carmustine wafers in the treatment of high-grade gliomas: a meta-analysis.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2015Pooled it
- The role of Gliadel wafers in the treatment of newly diagnosed GBM: a meta-analysis.Drug design, development and therapy · 2015Pooled it
- The prognostic and protective roles of heart-rate variability in glioblastoma: making GBM less vague.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Exploring the vast potentials and probable limitations of novel and nanostructured implantable drug delivery systems for cancer treatment.EXCLI journal · 2024Review
- Carmustine wafer implantation for supratentorial glioblastomas, IDH-wildtype in "extreme" neurosurgical conditions.Neurosurgical review · 2023Article
- Enhancement of Therapies for Glioblastoma (GBM) Using Nanoparticle-based Delivery Systems.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2021Review
- LINC00883 Promotes Drug Resistance of Glioma Through a microRNA-136/NEK1-Dependent Mechanism.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Glioblastoma Treatments: An Account of Recent Industrial Developments.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2018Review
- Advances in Brain Tumor Surgery for Glioblastoma in Adults.Brain sciences · 2017Review
- Glioblastoma Treatment in the Elderly.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2017Review
- Non-virally engineered human adipose mesenchymal stem cells produce BMP4, target brain tumors, and extend survival.Biomaterials · 2016Article
- Delivery of local therapeutics to the brain: working toward advancing treatment for malignant gliomas.Therapeutic delivery · 2015Review
- The future of high-grade glioma: Where we are and where are we going.Surgical neurology international · 2015Article
- The butterfly effect on glioblastoma: is volumetric extent of resection more effective than biopsy for these tumors?Journal of neuro-oncology · 2014Article
- Biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles show high efficacy and specificity at DNA delivery to human glioblastoma in vitro and in vivo.ACS nano · 2014Article
- Treatment of glioblastoma in elderly patients.CNS oncology · 2014Article
- Establishing percent resection and residual volume thresholds affecting survival and recurrence for patients with newly diagnosed intracranial glioblastoma.Neuro-oncology · 2014Article
- Multiple resections for patients with glioblastoma: prolonging survival.Journal of neurosurgery · 2013Article
- Polifeprosan 20, 3.85% carmustine slow-release wafer in malignant glioma: evidence for role in era of standard adjuvant temozolomide.Core evidence · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivePeak incidence of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) occurs in individuals aged 65 years and older. The goal was to evaluate the efficacy of carmustine wafers in prolonging survival for older GBM patients.
methodsOne hundred and thirty-three consecutive patients aged 65 years and older who underwent surgery for an intracranial primary (de novo) GBM from 1997-2007 were retrospectively reviewed. Among these 133 patients, 45 patients with carmustine wafer implantation were matched with 45 patients without implantation. These groups were matched for factors consistently shown to be associated with survival (age, Karnofsky performance scale, extent of resection, radiation therapy, and temozolomide). Survival was expressed as estimated Kaplan-Meier plots, and log-rank analysis was used to compare survival curves. Variables with P<0.05 were considered statistically significant.
resultsThe mean (±standard deviation) age of the cohort was 73±5 years, and the median survival of the entire cohort was 5.9 months. Among patients with and without carmustine wafers, there were no significant differences in pre- and peri-operative variables. However, patients with carmustine wafers demonstrated prolonged survival as compared to patients without wafers. The median survival for patients with carmustine wafers was 8.7 months, while median survival for patients without wafers was 5.5 months (P=0.007). Likewise, in subgroup analysis, patients older than 70 years (P=0.0003) and 75 years (P=0.04) who had carmustine wafers had significantly longer survival than matched patients without wafers. DISCUSSION: Older patients with GBM may benefit from carmustine wafers. The survival for older patients who received carmustine wafers is significantly longer than matched patients who did not receive carmustine wafers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.