Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21755569›Full record

ArticlePharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2011

Temporal and within practice variability in the health improvement network.

Kevin Haynes, Warren B Bilker, Tom R Tenhave, Brian L Strom, James D Lewis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Evaluating Frailty Index Integrity: Insights from an International Network Study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kevin HaynesDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA. khaynes@mail.med.upenn.edu
Warren B Bilker
Tom R Tenhave
Brian L Strom
James D Lewis

Funding

INSTITUTIONAL CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE AWARDUL1RR024134 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FITZGERALD, GARRET A · 2006 to 2011
$70.4M
CTRS FOR EDUCATION AND RESEARCH ON THERAPEUTICS (CERTS)U18HS010399 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI STROM, BRIAN LESLIE · 2000 to 2006
$800k
AHRQ HHS HS10399AHRQ HHS U18 HS010399NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024134NCRR NIH HHS UL1‐RR024134
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Health Improvement Network (THIN) database is a primary care electronic medical record database in the UK designed for pharmacoepidemiologic research. Matching on practice and calendar year often is used to account for secular trends in time and differences across practices. However, little is known about the consistency within practices across observation years and among practices within a given year, in THIN or other large medical record databases.

methodsWe analyzed mortality rates, cancer incidence rates, prescribing rates, and encounter rates across 415 practices from 2000 to 2007 using a practice-year as the unit of observation in separate random and fixed effects longitudinal Poisson regression models. Adjusted models accounted for aggregate practice-level characteristics (smoking, obesity, age, and Vision software experience).

resultsIn adjusted models, subsequent calendar years were associated with lower reported mortality rates, increasing cancer reporting rates, increasing prescriptions per patient, and decreasing encounters per patient, with a corresponding linear trend (p < 0.001 for all analyses). For calendar year 2007, the ratio of the 75th percentile to the 25th percentile for crude rate of cancer, mortality, prescriptions, and encounters was 1.63, 1.63, 1.45, and 1.42, respectively. Adjusting for practice characteristics reduced the among-practice variation by approximately 40%.

conclusionsTHIN data are characterized by secular trends and among-practice variation, both of which should be considered in the design of pharmacoepidemiology studies. Whether these are trends in data quality or true secular trends could not be definitively differentiated.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualPractice Patterns, Physicians'Epidemiologic MethodsFamily PracticeHumansMedical Records Systems, ComputerizedModels, TheoreticalPharmacoepidemiologyPrescriptionsTime FactorsUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID21755569
PMCPMC3225918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.