Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21754985›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2011

SMA CARNIVAL TRIAL PART II: a prospective, single-armed trial of L-carnitine and valproic acid in ambulatory children with spinal muscular atrophy.

John T Kissel, Charles B Scott, Sandra P Reyna, Thomas O Crawford, Louise R Simard, Kristin J Krosschell, Gyula Acsadi, Bakri Elsheik, Mary K Schroth, Guy D'Anjou and 8 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00227266 (Multi-center Phase II Trial of Valproic Acid and Carnitine in Patients With Spinal Muscular Atrophy), which is not on this map. Cited by 56 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00227266 phase2completednot on this map

Multi-center Phase II Trial of Valproic Acid and Carnitine in Patients With Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA CARNI-VAL Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2005 to 2007Enrolled94ConditionsSpinal Muscular AtrophyArmsValproic Acid and Levocarnitine, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Drug treatment for spinal muscular atrophy types II and III.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Drug treatment for spinal muscular atrophy type I.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

John T KisselDepartment of Neurology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America. john.kissel@osumc.edu
Charles B Scott
Sandra P Reyna
Thomas O Crawford
Louise R Simard
Kristin J Krosschell
Gyula Acsadi
Bakri Elsheik
Mary K Schroth
Guy D'Anjou
Bernard LaSalle
Thomas W Prior
Susan Sorenson
Jo Anne Maczulski
Mark B Bromberg
Gary M Chan
Kathryn J Swoboda
Project Cure Spinal Muscular Atrophy Investigators' Network
University of Utah · USThe Ohio State University · USAir Squared (United States) · USCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine · CAJohns Hopkins Medicine · USNorthwestern University · USPrimary Children's Hospital · USUniversity of Manitoba · CAUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USWayne State University · US

Funding

Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (UL1)UL1RR025005 · NCRR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, DANIEL ERNEST · 2007 to 2011
$75.8M
INSTITUTIONAL CTSA (UW-MADISON): CLINICAL TRIALSUL1RR025011 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2007 to 2011
$29.5M
University of Iowa Clinical and Translational Science Program (TL1)UL1RR025755 · NCRR · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JACKSON, REBECCA D · 2008 to 2011
$26.3M
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH CENTER FOR CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE-UL1: BPCAUL1RR025764 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MCCLAIN, DONALD A. · 2008 to 2011
$19.4M
Newborn screening for identification & prospective followup of infants with SMAR01HD069045 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI SWOBODA, KATHRYN J. · 2011 to 2015
$4.3M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025005NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR025005NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025011NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR025011NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025755NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR025755NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025764NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR025764NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD069045
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple lines of evidence have suggested that valproic acid (VPA) might benefit patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). The SMA CARNIVAL TRIAL was a two part prospective trial to evaluate oral VPA and L-carnitine in SMA children. Part 1 targeted non-ambulatory children ages 2-8 in a 12 month cross over design. We report here Part 2, a twelve month prospective, open-label trial of VPA and L-carnitine in ambulatory SMA children.

methodsThis study involved 33 genetically proven type 3 SMA subjects ages 3-17 years. Subjects underwent two baseline assessments over 4-6 weeks and then were placed on VPA and L-carnitine for 12 months. Assessments were performed at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months. Primary outcomes included safety, adverse events and the change at 6 and 12 months in motor function assessed using the Modified Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Extend (MHFMS-Extend), timed motor tests and fine motor modules. Secondary outcomes included changes in ulnar compound muscle action potential amplitudes (CMAP), handheld dynamometry, pulmonary function, and Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory scores.

resultsTwenty-eight subjects completed the study. VPA and carnitine were generally well tolerated. Although adverse events occurred in 85% of subjects, they were usually mild and transient. Weight gain of 20% above body weight occurred in 17% of subjects. There was no significant change in any primary outcome at six or 12 months. Some pulmonary function measures showed improvement at one year as expected with normal growth. CMAP significantly improved suggesting a modest biologic effect not clinically meaningful.

conclusionsThis study, coupled with the CARNIVAL Part 1 study, indicate that VPA is not effective in improving strength or function in SMA children. The outcomes used in this study are feasible and reliable, and can be employed in future trials in SMA. TRIAL REGSITRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00227266.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAdolescentAnticonvulsantsCarnitineChildChild, PreschoolDemographyFemaleGene Expression RegulationHumansMaleMotor ActivityMuscular Atrophy, SpinalProspective StudiesQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsAnticonvulsantsCarnitineRNA, MessengerSMN1 protein, humanSurvival of Motor Neuron 1 ProteinValproic Acid

Identifiers

PMID21754985
PMCPMC3130730
OpenAlexW1980466176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.