Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21754933›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2011

Knowledge, Awareness, and Attitudes about Research Ethics among Dental Faculty in the Middle East: A Pilot Study.

Hadir F El-Dessouky, Amr M Abdel-Aziz, Chadi Ibrahim, Malini Moni, Reham Abul Fadl, Henry Silverman

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of dentistry, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05195671 (Implications of Ethics Determinant on Dentistry and Pharmacy Research), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05195671 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Implications of Ethics Determinant on Dentistry and Pharmacy Research: A Study of IRB Perspective

TypeobservationalSponsorMisr International UniversityRan2021 to 2021Enrolled131ConditionsReview, Research PeerArmsReview
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Hadir F El-DessoukyFaculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.
Amr M Abdel-Aziz
Chadi Ibrahim
Malini Moni
Reham Abul Fadl
Henry Silverman
Ain Shams University · EGUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USKing Abdulaziz University · SA

Funding

Middle East Research Ethics Training Initiative (MERETI)R25TW007090 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI BRAIR, SARA LAVINIA FATAH EL RAHMAN, SILVERMAN, HENRY J · 2004 to 2020
$4.1M
FIC NIH HHS R25 TW007090
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective. To assess the knowledge, awareness, and attitudes of dental faculty regarding research ethics and research ethics committees (RECs). Design. Through convenience sampling, we distributed a survey to academics at dental faculties at two universities in the Middle East. We used descriptive, chi-square, and logistic regression statistics to analyze the data. Results. Our response rate was 62.5%. A large majority (>90%) held positive attitudes towards RECs; however, almost half (44.0%) thought that RECs would delay research. Less than half (36.8%) had received prior training in research ethics, and the average score they achieved on the questions on research ethics was only 40.2%. Most (>90%), however, were favorable towards research ethics education. Finally, some faculty held attitudes regarding certain research ethics practices that were not optimal. Conclusions. We conclude that among the dental faculties participating in our study, there is broad-based acceptance of RECs and training in research ethics, while there are knowledge gaps in research ethics. We recommend further studies to determine the generalizability of our findings to other institutions.

Identifiers

PMID21754933
PMCPMC3132601
OpenAlexW2098355651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.