Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21753877›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2011

Permeation of antigen protein-conjugated nanoparticles and live bacteria through microneedle-treated mouse skin.

Amit Kumar, Xinran Li, Michael A Sandoval, B Leticia Rodriguez, Brian R Sloat, Zhengrong Cui

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Microneedles for drug and vaccine delivery.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amit KumarUniversity of Texas at Austin, College of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutics Division, USA.
Xinran Li
Michael A Sandoval
B Leticia Rodriguez
Brian R Sloat
Zhengrong Cui
Austin College · USThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Topical DNA immunization by modifying the hair follicle cycleR01AI078304 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI CUI, ZHENGRONG · 2008 to 2011
$1.4M
A tri-antigen nasal anthrax vaccine against toxins and vegetative bacilli R21AI070538 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI CUI, ZHENGRONG · 2007 to 2008
$379k
NIAID NIH HHS AI070538NIAID NIH HHS AI078304NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI078304NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI070538
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe present study was designed to evaluate the extent to which pretreatment with microneedles can enhance skin permeation of nanoparticles in vitro and in vivo. Permeation of live bacteria, which are physically nanoparticles or microparticles, through mouse skin pretreated with microneedles was also studied to evaluate the potential risk of microbial infection. METHODS AND

resultsIt was found that pretreatment of mouse skin with microneedles allowed permeation of solid lipid nanoparticles, size 230 nm, with ovalbumin conjugated on their surface. Transcutaneous immunization in a mouse skin area pretreated with microneedles with ovalbumin nanoparticles induced a stronger antiovalbumin antibody response than using ovalbumin alone. The dose of ovalbumin antigen determined whether microneedle-mediated transcutaneous immunization with ovalbumin nanoparticles induced a stronger immune response than subcutaneous injection of the same ovalbumin nanoparticles. Microneedle treatment permitted skin permeation of live Escherichia coli, but the extent of the permeation was not greater than that enabled by hypodermic injection.

conclusionTranscutaneous immunization on a microneedle-treated skin area with antigens carried by nanoparticles can potentially induce a strong immune response, and the risk of bacterial infection associated with microneedle treatment is no greater than that with a hypodermic injection.

Indexed as

Administration, CutaneousAnimalsAntigensColony Count, MicrobialDose-Response Relationship, ImmunologicDrug Delivery SystemsEscherichia coliFemaleImmunizationImmunoglobulin GMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMicrotechnologyNanoconjugatesNeedlesOvalbuminAntigensImmunoglobulin GNanoconjugatesOvalbuminWaterantibody responsessafety of microneedlestransepidermal water loss

Identifiers

PMID21753877
PMCPMC3131192
OpenAlexW2073548105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.