Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21753226›Full record

Trial reportEuropean heart journal2011

Combustion-derived nanoparticulate induces the adverse vascular effects of diesel exhaust inhalation.

Nicholas L Mills, Mark R Miller, Andrew J Lucking, Jon Beveridge, Laura Flint, A John F Boere, Paul H Fokkens, Nicholas A Boon, Thomas Sandstrom, Anders Blomberg and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European heart journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 221 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Nicholas L MillsThe BHF/University Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh University, The Queens Medical Research Institute, 47 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, UK.
Mark R Miller
Andrew J Lucking
Jon Beveridge
Laura Flint
A John F Boere
Paul H Fokkens
Nicholas A Boon
Thomas Sandstrom
Anders Blomberg
Rodger Duffin
Ken Donaldson
Patrick W F Hadoke
Flemming R Cassee
David E Newby
The Queen's Medical Research Institute · GBNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NLCentre for Inflammation Research · GBUmeå University · SE

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/10/024/28266British Heart Foundation PG/10/42/28388British Heart Foundation RG/10/9/28286Chief Scientist Office
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimExposure to road traffic and air pollution may be a trigger of acute myocardial infarction, but the individual pollutants responsible for this effect have not been established. We assess the role of combustion-derived-nanoparticles in mediating the adverse cardiovascular effects of air pollution. METHODS AND

resultsTo determine the in vivo effects of inhalation of diesel exhaust components, 16 healthy volunteers were exposed to (i) dilute diesel exhaust, (ii) pure carbon nanoparticulate, (iii) filtered diesel exhaust, or (iv) filtered air, in a randomized double blind cross-over study. Following each exposure, forearm blood flow was measured during intra-brachial bradykinin, acetylcholine, sodium nitroprusside, and verapamil infusions. Compared with filtered air, inhalation of diesel exhaust increased systolic blood pressure (145 ± 4 vs. 133 ± 3 mmHg, P< 0.05) and attenuated vasodilatation to bradykinin (P= 0.005), acetylcholine (P= 0.008), and sodium nitroprusside (P< 0.001). Exposure to pure carbon nanoparticulate or filtered exhaust had no effect on endothelium-dependent or -independent vasodilatation. To determine the direct vascular effects of nanoparticulate, isolated rat aortic rings (n= 6-9 per group) were assessed in vitro by wire myography and exposed to diesel exhaust particulate, pure carbon nanoparticulate and vehicle. Compared with vehicle, diesel exhaust particulate (but not pure carbon nanoparticulate) attenuated both acetylcholine (P< 0.001) and sodium-nitroprusside (P= 0.019)-induced vasorelaxation. These effects were partially attributable to both soluble and insoluble components of the particulate.

conclusionCombustion-derived nanoparticulate appears to predominately mediate the adverse vascular effects of diesel exhaust inhalation. This provides a rationale for testing environmental health interventions targeted at reducing traffic-derived particulate emissions.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAir PollutantsAnimalsAortaBlood PressureCarbonCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodForearmHumansInhalation ExposureMaleMuscle ContractionMuscle, Smooth, VascularNanoparticlesAir PollutantsCarbonVasoconstrictor AgentsVasodilator AgentsVehicle Emissions

Identifiers

PMID21753226
PMCPMC3205591
OpenAlexW2144344073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.