Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21753007›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2011

Genetic dissection of EphA receptor signaling dynamics during retinotopic mapping.

Nicholas Bevins, Greg Lemke, Michaël Reber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Copy number variation analysis in 98 individuals with PHACE syndrome.The Journal of investigative dermatology · 2013
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Epigenetic regulation of retinal development and disease.Journal of ocular biology, diseases, and informatics · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicholas BevinsMolecular Neurobiology Laboratory, The Salk Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, USA.
Greg Lemke
Michaël Reber

Funding

XENOPUS NOTCH AND NEURONAL DETERMINATIONP01NS031249 · NINDS · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI LEMKE, GREG E · 1993 to 2011
$16.6M
NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS031249NINDS NIH HHS P01NS031249
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) project axons from their cell bodies in the eye to targets in the superior colliculus of the midbrain. The wiring of these axons to their synaptic targets creates an ordered representation, or "map," of retinal space within the brain. Many lines of experiments have demonstrated that the development of this map requires complementary gradients of EphA receptor tyrosine kinases and their ephrin-A ligands, yet basic features of EphA signaling during mapping remain to be resolved. These include the individual roles played by the multiple EphA receptors that make up the retinal EphA gradient. We have developed a set of ratiometric "relative signaling" (RS) rules that quantitatively predict how the composite low-nasal-to-high-temporal EphA gradient is translated into topographic order among RGCs. A key feature of these rules is that the component receptors of the gradient--in the mouse, EphA4, EphA5, and EphA6--must be functionally equivalent and interchangeable. To test this aspect of the model, we generated compound mutant mice in which the periodicity, slope, and receptor composition of the gradient are systematically altered with respect to the levels of EphA4, EphA5, and a closely related receptor, EphA3, that we ectopically express. Analysis of the retinotopic maps of these new mouse mutants establishes the general utility of the RS rules for predicting retinocollicular topography, and demonstrates that individual EphA gene products are approximately equivalent with respect to axon guidance and target selection.

Indexed as

AnimalsAxonsMiceMice, TransgenicReceptors, Eph FamilyRetinaRetinal Ganglion CellsSignal TransductionSuperior ColliculiVisual PathwaysReceptors, Eph Family

Identifiers

PMID21753007
PMCPMC3144163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.