Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21752976›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2011

Rapid discrimination between Candida glabrata, Candida nivariensis, and Candida bracarensis by use of a singleplex PCR.

A Enache-Angoulvant, J Guitard, F Grenouillet, T Martin, P Durrens, C Fairhead, C Hennequin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Overview on the Infections Related to RarePathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  4. First Isolation of Candida nivariensis, an Emerging Fungal Pathogen, in Kuwait.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

A Enache-AngoulvantAPHP, Hôpital Bicêtre, Service de Bactériologie-Virologie-Parasitologie, Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Kremlin-Bicêtre 94275, France. adela.angoulvant@bct.aphp.fr
J Guitard
F Grenouillet
T Martin
P Durrens
C Fairhead
C Hennequin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report here a PCR-based assay using a single primer pair targeting the RPL31 gene that allows discrimination between Candida glabrata, Candida bracarensis, and Candida nivariensis according to the size of the generated amplicon.

Indexed as

Base SequenceCandidaCandidiasisDNA, FungalDNA PrimersDNA, Ribosomal SpacerHumansMicrobiological TechniquesMolecular Sequence DataPolymerase Chain ReactionSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, DNADNA, FungalDNA PrimersDNA, Ribosomal Spacer

Identifiers

PMID21752976
PMCPMC3165624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.