Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21752925›Full record

ArticleGenome research2012

Assessment of palindromes as platforms for DNA amplification in breast cancer.

Jamie Guenthoer, Scott J Diede, Hisashi Tanaka, Xiaoyu Chai, Li Hsu, Stephen J Tapscott, Peggy L Porter

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Palindromes in DNA-A Risk for Genome Stability and Implications in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jamie GuenthoerDivision of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA.
Scott J Diede
Hisashi Tanaka
Xiaoyu Chai
Li Hsu
Stephen J Tapscott
Peggy L Porter
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · USUniversity of Washington · USCleveland Clinic · US

Funding

Translational Bioimaging Core Shared ResourceP30CA015704 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Marian Esvelt · 1985 to 2026
$296.4M
TUMOR METABOLISM PROGRAMP30CA043703 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI MARK R CHANCE · 1987 to 2026
$142.3M
Interdisciplinary Tranining in Cancer ResearchT32CA080416 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI STODDARD, BARRY L. · 1998 to 2023
$9.7M
PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAMT32CA009351 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Elizabeth R Lawlor, SOHEIL MESHINCHI · 1985 to 2026
$7.0M
LINEAGE DETERMINATION IN MUSCLER01AR045113 · NIAMS · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI TAPSCOTT, STEPHEN J · 1998 to 2017
$6.8M
Mechanisms of gene amplification in human cancersR01CA149385 · NCI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI TANAKA, HISASHI · 2010 to 2022
$3.4M
Cellular and Molecular Biology of Childhood DiseaseK12HD043376 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI STAPLETON, FIELDING BRUDER · 2003 to 2012
$3.3M
Gene Copy Number Changes and Breast Cancer SurvivalR01CA098415 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI PORTER, PEGGY L. · 2004 to 2008
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015704NCI NIH HHS P30 CA043703NCI NIH HHS P30CA43703NCI NIH HHS R01 CA098415NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009351NCI NIH HHS T32CA009351NCI NIH HHS T32 CA080416NCI NIH HHS T32 CA80416NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR045113NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD043376NICHD NIH HHS K12HD43376PHS HHS R0ICA1493835
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA amplification, particularly of chromosomes 8 and 11, occurs frequently in breast cancer and is a key factor in tumorigenesis, often associated with poor prognosis. The mechanisms involved in the amplification of these regions are not fully understood. Studies from model systems have demonstrated that palindrome formation can be an early step in DNA amplification, most notably seen in the breakage-fusion-bridge (BFB) cycle. Therefore, palindromes might be associated with gene amplicons in breast cancer. To address this possibility, we coupled high-resolution palindrome profiling by the Genome-wide Analysis of Palindrome Formation (GAPF) assay with genome-wide copy-number analyses on a set of breast cancer cell lines and primary tumors to spatially associate palindromes and copy-number gains. We identified GAPF-positive regions distributed nonrandomly throughout cell line and tumor genomes, often in clusters, and associated with copy-number gains. Commonly amplified regions in breast cancer, chromosomes 8q and 11q, had GAPF-positive regions flanking and throughout the copy-number gains. We also identified amplification-associated GAPF-positive regions at similar locations in subsets of breast cancers with similar characteristics (e.g., ERBB2 amplification). These shared positive regions offer the potential to evaluate the utility of palindromes as prognostic markers, particularly in premalignant breast lesions. Our results implicate palindrome formation in the amplification of regions with key roles in breast tumorigenesis, particularly in subsets of breast cancers.

Indexed as

Gene AmplificationInverted Repeat SequencesBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorChromosomes, Human, Pair 11Chromosomes, Human, Pair 12Chromosomes, Human, Pair 8Comparative Genomic HybridizationDNA Copy Number VariationsFemaleGenes, mycGenome-Wide Association StudyHumans

Identifiers

PMID21752925
PMCPMC3266031
OpenAlexW2069579961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.