Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21752879›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2011

Oral contraceptive use and bone density change in adolescent and young adult women: a prospective study of age, hormone dose, and discontinuation.

Delia Scholes, Rebecca A Hubbard, Laura E Ichikawa, Andrea Z LaCroix, Leslie Spangler, Jeannette M Beasley, Susan Reed, Susan M Ott

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effects of Estrogen Replacement on Bone Geometry and Microarchitecture in Adolescent and Young Adult Oligoamenorrheic Athletes: A Randomized Trial.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2020
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Bone Health for Gynaecologists.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2024.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Diminished bone strength is observed in adult women and men who sustained a mild trauma distal forearm fracture during childhood.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2014
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Delia ScholesGroup Health Research Institute, Group Health Cooperative, 1730 Minor Avenue, 16th Floor, Seattle, Washington 98101, USA. scholes.d@ghc.org
Rebecca A Hubbard
Laura E Ichikawa
Andrea Z LaCroix
Leslie Spangler
Jeannette M Beasley
Susan Reed
Susan M Ott
Group Health Cooperative · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Oral Contraceptive Use and Bone Density in Young WomenR01HD031165 · NICHD · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI SCHOLES, DELIA · 1994 to 2008
$3.9M
Health Care Improvement for Aging WomenT32AG027677 · NIA · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI LACROIX, ANDREA Z. · 2007 to 2016
$1.4M
NIA NIH HHS T-32 AG027677NIA NIH HHS T32 AG027677NICHD NIH HHS 1R01-HD31165-11NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD031165
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextOral contraceptive (OC) use is common, but bone changes associated with use of contemporary OC remain unclear.

objectiveThe objective of the study was to compare bone mineral density (BMD) change in adolescent and young adult OC users and discontinuers of two estrogen doses, relative to nonusers. DESIGN AND

settingThis was a prospective cohort study, Group Health Cooperative.

participantsParticipants included 606 women aged 14-30 yr (50% adolescents aged 14-18 yr): 389 OC users [62% 30-35 μg ethinyl estradiol (EE)] and 217 age-similar nonusers; there were 172 OC discontinuers. The 24-month retention was 78%.

main outcome measureThe main outcome measure was BMD measured at 6-month intervals for 24-36 months.

resultsAfter 24 months, adolescents using 30-35 μg EE OCs, but not those using lower-dose OCs, had significantly smaller adjusted mean percentage BMD gains than nonusers at the spine [group means (95% confidence interval for between group differences) 1.32 vs. 2.26% (-1.89, -0.13%)] and whole body [1.45 vs. 2.03% (-1.29%, -0.13%)]. Adolescents who discontinued 30-35 μg EE OC showed significantly smaller gains than nonusers at the spine after 12 months [0.51 vs. 1.72% (-2.38%, -0.30%)]. Young adult OC users did not differ from nonusers. However, OC discontinuers of both doses differed significantly from nonusers at the spine 12 months after discontinuation [-1.32% < 30 μg EE, -0.92% 30-35 μg EE vs. +0.27% nonusers (-2.48, -0.54, and -1.94%, -0.55%, respectively)]. Results were similar for mean absolute BMD change (grams per square centimeter).

conclusionsBoth OC use and discontinuation were associated with BMD losses/smaller gains relative to nonusers (differences < 2% after 12-24 months for all skeletal sites). The clinical significance of these results regarding future fracture risk is unknown. Study of longer-term trends after discontinuation is needed.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBone DensityContraceptives, Oral, HormonalEthinyl EstradiolFemaleHumansProspective StudiesRadiographySpineContraceptives, Oral, HormonalEthinyl Estradiol

Identifiers

PMID21752879
PMCPMC3167673
OpenAlexW1993203477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.