Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21752634›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2011

Inhibitory circuits for visual processing in thalamus.

Xin Wang, Friedrich T Sommer, Judith A Hirsch

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Differential Impact of Retinal Lesions on Visual Responses of LGN X and Y Cells.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  2. GABAergic Projections from the Pretectum Boost Retinogeniculate Signal Transfer via Disinhibition.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Associative Thalamus: A Switchboard for Cortical Operations and a Promising Target for Schizophrenia.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Contrast gain control and retinogeniculate communication.The European journal of neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xin WangComputational Neurobiology Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla California, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Friedrich T Sommer
Judith A Hirsch

Funding

Neural Circuits That Process Visual InformationR01EY009593 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Judith A Hirsch · 1999 to 2026
$9.2M
DYNAMIC PROPERTIES OF VISUAL CORTICAL CIRCUITSR29EY009593 · NEI · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI HIRSCH, JUDITH A · 1993 to 1997
–
NEI NIH HHS EY09593NEI NIH HHS R01 EY009593
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synapses made by local interneurons dominate the intrinsic circuitry of the mammalian visual thalamus and influence all signals traveling from the eye to cortex. Here we draw on physiological and computational analyses of receptive fields in the cat's lateral geniculate nucleus to describe how inhibition helps to enhance selectivity for stimulus features in space and time and to improve the efficiency of the neural code. Further, we explore specialized synaptic attributes of relay cells and interneurons and discuss how these might be adapted to preserve the temporal precision of retinal spike trains and thereby maximize the rate of information transmitted downstream.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsHumansInterneuronsModels, NeurologicalNerve NetNeural InhibitionPhotic StimulationSynapsesThalamusVisual Pathways

Identifiers

PMID21752634
PMCPMC3767471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.