Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21752067›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2012

Junior doctors prescribing: enhancing their learning in practice.

Charlotte Rothwell, Bryan Burford, Jill Morrison, Gill Morrow, Maggie Allen, Carol Davies, Beate Baldauf, John Spencer, Neil Johnson, Ed Peile and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Opioid prescribing and medical education: can primary care fill in the gaps?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Preparedness to prescribe antibiotics responsibly: a comparison between final year medical students in France and Sweden.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Bridging the gap: improving safe prescribing from university to workplace.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Charlotte RothwellDurham University, Medical Education Research Group, Burdon House, Leazes Road, Durham DH1 1TA, UK. c.r.rothwell@durham.ac.uk
Bryan Burford
Jill Morrison
Gill Morrow
Maggie Allen
Carol Davies
Beate Baldauf
John Spencer
Neil Johnson
Ed Peile
Jan Illing

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis aim of this paper was to explore new doctors' preparedness for prescribing.

methodsThis was a multiple methods study including face-to-face and telephone interviews, questionnaires and secondary data from a safe prescribing assessment (n= 284). Three medical schools with differing curricula and cohorts were included: Newcastle (systems-based, integrated curriculum); Warwick (graduate entry) and Glasgow [problem-based learning (PBL)], with graduates entering F1 in their local deanery. The primary sample consisted of final year medical students, stratified by academic quartile (n= 65) from each of the three UK medical schools. In addition an anonymous cohort questionnaire was distributed at each site (n= 480), triangulating interviews were conducted with 92 clinicians and questionnaire data were collected from 80 clinicians who had worked with F1s.

resultsData from the primary sample and cohort data highlighted that graduates entering F1 felt under-prepared for prescribing. However there was improvement over the F1 year through practical experience and support. Triangulating data reinforced the primary sample findings. Participants reported that learning in an applied setting would be helpful and increase confidence in prescribing. No clear differences were found in preparedness to prescribe between graduates of the three medical schools.

conclusionThe results form part of a larger study 'Are medical graduates fully prepared for practice?'. Prescribing was found to be the weakest area of practice in all sources of data. There is a need for more applied learning to develop skill-based, applied aspects of prescribing which would help to improve preparedness for prescribing.

Indexed as

CurriculumPractice Patterns, Physicians'Clinical CompetenceDrug PrescriptionsEducation, Medical, GraduateHumansProblem-Based LearningStudents, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID21752067
PMCPMC3269578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.