Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21751048›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2012

The experience of symptoms and information needs of cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy.

Gülsüm Nihal Güleser, Sultan Taşci, Bünyamin Kaplan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Shared decision-making in radiotherapy for rectal cancer - A systematic review.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Impact of patient information format on the experience of cancer patients treated with radiotherapy.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Exploring Cancer Patients' Perceptions of Accessing and Experience with Using the Educational Material in the Opal Patient Portal.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Importance of and Satisfaction with Information about Their Disease in Cancer Patients.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Perception and Assessment of Verbal and Written Information on Sex and Relationships after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2017
    Article
  15. Barriers to information provision regarding breast cancer and its treatment.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Development and Evaluation of Patient Education Materials for Elderly Lung Cancer Patients.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Optimizing cancer care through mobile health.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2015
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gülsüm Nihal GüleserErciyes University Halil Bayraktar Health Services Vocational College, Kayseri, Turkey. gulsumc@erciyes.edu.tr
Sultan Taşci
Bünyamin Kaplan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim was to determine the symptoms and information needs of cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT). The study population consisted of 345 RT patients accrued over 6 months. Patients' needs for information, sources of information, levels of satisfaction with information, symptoms and demographic factors were assessed by questionnaire and personal interview. Chi-square tests were used to test the correlation between patient variables and information needs/experiences. Most patients (80.9%) experienced RT side effects--fatigue, nausea, vomiting and loss of appetite were the most frequent. More than half of the patients had not received information about RT; however, patients (83.2%) who had problems during the treatment wanted to have information (P < 0.05). The majority of the patients receiving information identified doctors as the primary source. The patients' prioritized needs for information were all the aspects of their diagnosis and treatment and side effects of RT. Overall, the results indicate that most patients require information about their treatment and also experienced a variety of symptoms.

Indexed as

Health Services Needs and DemandRadiation OncologyAdultFatigueFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNauseaNeoplasmsPatient Education as TopicRadiotherapySurveys and QuestionnairesVomitingYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.