ArticleJournal of chemical ecology2011
Attraction modulated by spacing of pheromone components and anti-attractants in a bark beetle and a moth.
Article in Journal of chemical ecology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of Release Rate and Location of Release Devices of Pheromone Component endo-Brevicomin on Attraction of the Southern Pine Beetle.Journal of chemical ecology · 2025Article
- Eurasian spruce bark beetle detects lanierone using a highly expressed specialist odorant receptor, present in several functional sensillum types.BMC biology · 2024Article
- Olfactory receptor neurons are sensitive to stimulus onset asynchrony: implications for odor source discrimination.Chemical senses · 2024Article
- Extracting spatial information from temporal odor patterns: insights from insects.Current opinion in insect science · 2023Review
- Reduced olfactory acuity in recently flightless insects suggests rapid regressive evolution.BMC ecology and evolution · 2022Article
- Styrene, (+)-trans-(1R,4S,5S)-4-Thujanol and Oxygenated Monoterpenes Related to Host Stress Elicit Strong Electrophysiological Responses in the Bark Beetle Ips typographus.Journal of chemical ecology · 2019Article
- Article
- Segregation of Unknown Odors From Mixtures Based on Stimulus Onset Asynchrony in Honey Bees.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2019Article
- Odor Stimuli: Not Just Chemical Identity.Frontiers in physiology · 2019Review
- Rapid Divergence of Wing Volatile Profiles Between Subspecies of the Butterfly Pieris rapae (Lepidoptera: Pieridae).Journal of insect science (Online) · 2018Article
- Olfactory coding in the turbulent realm.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
- The Ratio between Field Attractive and Background Volatiles Encodes Host-Plant Recognition in a Specialist Moth.Frontiers in plant science · 2017Article
- High-speed odor transduction and pulse tracking by insect olfactory receptor neurons.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014Article
- Non-host volatile blend optimization for forest protection against the European spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus.PloS one · 2014Article
- Elemental and configural olfactory coding by antennal lobe neurons of the honeybee (Apis mellifera).Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2012Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Orientation for insects in olfactory landscapes with high semiochemical diversity may be a challenging task. The partitioning of odor plumes into filaments that are interspersed with pockets of 'clean air' may help filament discrimination and upwind flight to attractive sources in the face of inhibitory signals. We studied the effect of distance between odor sources on trap catches of the beetle, Ips typographus, and the moth, Spodoptera littoralis. Insects were tested both to spatially separated pheromone components [cis-verbenol and 2-methyl-3-buten-2-ol for Ips; (Z,E)-9,11-tetradecadienyl acetate and (Z,E)-9,12-tetradecadienyl acetate for Spodoptera], and to separated pheromone and anti-attractant sources [non-host volatile (NHV) blend for Ips; (Z)-9-tetradecenyl acetate for Spodoptera]. Trap catch data were complemented with simulations of plume structure and plume overlap from two separated sources using a photo ionization detector and soap bubble generators. Trap catches of the beetle and the moth were both affected when odor sources in the respective traps were increasingly separated. However, this effect on trap catch occurred at smaller (roughly by an order of magnitude) odor source separation distances for the moth than for the beetle. This may reflect differences between the respective olfactory systems and central processing. For both species, the changes in trap catches in response to separation of pheromone components occurred at similar spacing distances as for separation of pheromone and anti-attractant sources. Overlap between two simulated plumes depended on distance between the two sources. In addition, the number of detected filaments and their concentration decreased with downwind distance. This implies that the response to separated odor sources in the two species might take place under different olfactory conditions. Deploying multiple sources of anti-attractant around a pheromone trap indicated long-distance (meter scale) effects of NHV on the beetle and a potential use for NHV in forest protection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21750948What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.