Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21750939›Full record

ArticleMycopathologia2011

Prevalence of Candida dubliniensis fungemia in Argentina: identification by a novel multiplex PCR and comparison of different phenotypic methods.

Maria Eugenia Bosco-Borgeat, Constanza Giselle Taverna, Susana Cordoba, Maria Guillermina Isla, Omar Alejandro Murisengo, Wanda Szusz, Walter Vivot, Graciela Davel

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mycopathologia, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prevalence and Species Distribution ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Candida dubliniensis fungemia in a patient with severe COVID-19: A case report.Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy · 2022
    Article
  5. Differentiation ofInternational journal of microbiology · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Clinical and microbiological diagnosis of oral candidiasis.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2013
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maria Eugenia Bosco-BorgeatDepartamento Micología, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Infecciosas, ANLIS Dr. C.G. Malbrán, Av. Velez Sarsfield 563, C1282AFF, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. ebosco@anlis.gov.ar
Constanza Giselle Taverna
Susana Cordoba
Maria Guillermina Isla
Omar Alejandro Murisengo
Wanda Szusz
Walter Vivot
Graciela Davel
Administración Nacional de Laboratorios e Institutos de Salud · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Candida dubliniensis is an emerging pathogen that can cause invasive disease in patients who have a variety of clinical conditions. C. dubliniensis is often misidentified as Candida albicans by clinical laboratories. In Argentina, incidence data are still scarce, and only one systemic infection has been reported. This study aims to determine the prevalence of C. dubliniensis in blood samples in Argentina, to evaluate a novel PCR multiplex as well as several phenotypic methods for the identification of this yeast, and to know the susceptibility profile of isolates against seven antifungal drugs. We have found that prevalence in Argentina appears to be lower than that reported in other countries, occurring only in 0.96% of the Candidemia cases recovered in 47 hospitals during a 1-year period. All C. dubliniensis clinical isolates included in this study were genetically identical when comparing ITS genes sequences. This is in agreement with the previous studies suggesting little genetic variation within this species. The novel multiplex PCR proved to be 100% sensitive and specific for the identification of C. dubliniensis. Therefore, we propose its use as a rapid and inexpensive method for laboratories having access to molecular techniques. Although no single phenotypic test has proved to be infallible, both colony morphology on tobacco agar, as well as abundant chlamydospore formation on both tobacco agar and on sunflower seed agar, may be used as a presumptive differentiation method in routine mycology laboratories. It has been suggested that C. dubliniensis may have higher propensity to develop azole antifungal drug resistance than C. albicans. In this study, one of the five clinical isolates of C. dubliniensis was resistant to fluconazole.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntifungal AgentsArgentinaAzolesBase SequenceCandidaCandidemiaDNA, FungalDrug Resistance, FungalFemaleFungal ProteinsHumansMaleMembrane GlycoproteinsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAntifungal AgentsAzolesDNA, FungalFungal ProteinsMembrane GlycoproteinsPHR1 protein, Candida albicans

Identifiers

PMID21750939
OpenAlexW2135611787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.