Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21750937›Full record

ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2011

BK and Kv3.1 potassium channels control different aspects of deep cerebellar nuclear neurons action potentials and spiking activity.

Christine M Pedroarena

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. BK Channelopathies andAnnual review of physiology · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. BK Channel Regulation of Afterpotentials and Burst Firing in Cerebellar Purkinje Neurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Potassium Channels in Epilepsy.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2016
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Genetic activation of BK currents in vivo generates bidirectional effects on neuronal excitability.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
  13. The cerebellar nuclei take center stage.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christine M PedroarenaDepartment of Cognitive Neurology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Systems Neurophysiology, CIN, University of Tübingen, Otfried Müller Strasse 27, Tübingen, Germany. christine.pedroarena@uni-tuebingen.de
Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep cerebellar nuclear neurons (DCNs) display characteristic electrical properties, including spontaneous spiking and the ability to discharge narrow spikes at high frequency. These properties are thought to be relevant to processing inhibitory Purkinje cell input and transferring well-timed signals to cerebellar targets. Yet, the underlying ionic mechanisms are not completely understood. BK and Kv3.1 potassium channels subserve similar functions in spike repolarization and fast firing in many neurons and are both highly expressed in DCNs. Here, their role in the abovementioned spiking characteristics was addressed using whole-cell recordings of large and small putative-glutamatergic DCNs. Selective BK channel block depolarized DCNs of both groups and increased spontaneous firing rate but scarcely affected evoked activity. After adjusting the membrane potential to control levels, the spike waveforms under BK channel block were indistinguishable from control ones, indicating no significant BK channel involvement in spike repolarization. The increased firing rate suggests that lack of DCN-BK channels may have contributed to the ataxic phenotype previously found in BK channel-deficient mice. On the other hand, block of Kv3.1 channels with low doses of 4-aminopyridine (20 μM) hindered spike repolarization and severely depressed evoked fast firing. Therefore, I propose that despite similar characteristics of BK and Kv3.1 channels, they play different roles in DCNs: BK channels control almost exclusively spontaneous firing rate, whereas DCN-Kv3.1 channels dominate the spike repolarization and enable fast firing. Interestingly, after Kv3.1 channel block, BK channels gained a role in spike repolarization, demonstrating how the different function of each of the two channels is determined in part by their co-expression and interplay.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsAnimals, NewbornCerebellar NucleiLarge-Conductance Calcium-Activated Potassium ChannelsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNeural InhibitionNeuronsOrgan Culture TechniquesShaw Potassium ChannelsKcnc1 protein, mouseLarge-Conductance Calcium-Activated Potassium ChannelsShaw Potassium Channels

Identifiers

PMID21750937
OpenAlexW2079131863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.