ReviewJournal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology2011
Revised You're Welcome criteria and future developments in adolescent healthcare.
Review in Journal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experience of Sexual Healthcare by Māori and Non-Māori Young People: An Online Survey of 15-24 Year Olds in Hawkes Bay, New Zealand.International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2022Article
- Transition of Adolescents with Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Are the Pediatric Teams up to the Task?Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Article
- Value of an outpatient transition clinic for young people with inflammatory bowel disease: a mixed-methods evaluation.BMJ open · 2020Article
- Article
- Article
- Our future: a Lancet commission on adolescent health and wellbeing.Lancet (London, England) · 2016Review
- Adolescent inpatient activity 1999-2010: analysis of English Hospital Episode Statistics data.Archives of disease in childhood · 2014Article
- Estimates of self-reported dietary behavior related to oral health among adolescents according to the type of food.Journal of applied oral science : revista FOBArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 2011, the Department of Health (England) will publish revised You're Welcome criteria. This is the first comprehensive attempt to define good quality health services for young people (11-19 years) and provide a self-assessment tool applicable to all adolescent health services. It builds on a growing understanding of the distinctiveness and importance of adolescent health, and the demands placed on adolescent health services. This article reviews changing understandings of the nature of adolescence, including physical, psychological and social transition, evolving patterns of morbidity and mortality, adolescence as part of a life-course approach to health and health behaviours, and the specific needs of young people when using health services. We describe key features of the You're Welcome criteria and discuss the views of young people and professionals involved in revising them, as well as relevant published literature. Lastly, we discuss how the perspective of social paediatrics may be useful in guiding professionals towards a more holistic approach to adolescent care in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.