ArticleGenetics2011
The genetic basis of rapidly evolving male genital morphology in Drosophila.
Article in Genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- A developmental atlas of male terminalia across twelve species ofFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Article
- Interspecific introgression reveals a role of male genital morphology during the evolution of reproductive isolation in Drosophila.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2021Article
- Unraveling the Genetic Basis for the Rapid Diversification of Male Genitalia between Drosophila Species.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021Article
- Insulin-Like Peptides and Cross-Talk With Other Factors in the Regulation of Insect Metabolism.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Review
- TheG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020Article
- Evolution of Reproductive Behavior.Genetics · 2020Review
- An Atlas of Transcription Factors Expressed in Male Pupal Terminalia ofG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019Article
- Article
- Genetic basis of species-specific genitalia reveals role in species diversification.Science advances · 2019Article
- Genetic and Transgenic Reagents forG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2017Article
- Neurons That Underlie Drosophila melanogaster Reproductive Behaviors: Detection of a Large Male-Bias in Gene Expression in fruitless-Expressing Neurons.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2016Article
- Mapping QTL Contributing to Variation in Posterior Lobe Morphology between Strains of Drosophila melanogaster.PloS one · 2016Article
- Odonata (dragonflies and damselflies) as a bridge between ecology and evolutionary genomics.Frontiers in zoology · 2016Review
- Article
- Copulatory wounding and traumatic insemination.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2015Review
- Genome-Wide Association Study on Male Genital Shape and Size in Drosophila melanogaster.PloS one · 2015Article
- The role of aedeagus size and shape in failed mating interactions among recently diverged taxa in the Drosophila mojavensis species cluster.BMC evolutionary biology · 2014Article
- Individual Genetic Contributions to Genital Shape Variation between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana.International journal of evolutionary biology · 2014Article
- Eat to reproduce: a key role for the insulin signaling pathway in adult insects.Frontiers in physiology · 2013Article
- Coevolution between male and female genitalia in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup.PloS one · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The external genitalia are some of the most rapidly evolving morphological structures in insects. The posterior lobe of the male genital arch shows striking differences in both size and shape among closely related species of the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup. Here, we dissect the genetic basis of posterior lobe morphology between D. mauritiana and D. sechellia, two island endemic species that last shared a common ancestor ∼300,000 years ago. We test a large collection of genome-wide homozygous D. mauritiana genetic introgressions, which collectively cover ∼50% of the genome, for their morphological effects when placed in a D. sechellia genetic background. We find several introgressions that have large effects on posterior lobe morphology and that posterior lobe size and posterior lobe shape can be separated genetically for some of the loci that specify morphology. Using next generation sequencing technology, we perform whole transcriptome gene expression analyses of the larval genital imaginal disc of D. mauritiana, D. sechellia, and two D. mauritiana-D. sechellia hybrid introgression genotypes that each have large effects on either posterior lobe size or posterior lobe shape. Many of the genes we identify as differentially expressed are expressed at levels similar to D. mauritiana in one introgression hybrid, but are expressed at levels similar to D. sechellia in the other introgression hybrid. However, we also find that both introgression hybrids express some of the same genes at levels similar to D. mauritiana, and notably, that both introgression hybrids possess genes in the insulin receptor signaling pathway, which are expressed at D. mauritiana expression levels. These results suggest the possibility that the insulin signaling pathway might integrate size and shape genetic inputs to establish differences in overall posterior lobe morphology between D. mauritiana and D. sechellia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.