Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21750108›Full record

ArticleGenome research2011

Loss of exon identity is a common mechanism of human inherited disease.

Timothy Sterne-Weiler, Jonathan Howard, Matthew Mort, David N Cooper, Jeremy R Sanford

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed, 176 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Alternative Splicing Regulation in Metabolic Disorders.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Large-scale functional screen identifies genetic variants with splicing effects in modern and archaic humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Genome-wide detection of human variants that disrupt intronic branchpoints.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Timothy Sterne-WeilerDepartment of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California 95064, USA.
Jonathan Howard
Matthew Mort
David N Cooper
Jeremy R Sanford
University of California, Santa Cruz · USCardiff University · GB

Funding

Genomic analysis of RNA binding protein target specificityR01GM085121 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI SANFORD, JEREMY ROBERT · 2008 to 2010
$1.1M
NHGRI NIH HHS L30 HG005198NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM085121NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM085121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is widely accepted that at least 10% of all mutations causing human inherited disease disrupt splice-site consensus sequences. In contrast to splice-site mutations, the role of auxiliary cis-acting elements such as exonic splicing enhancers (ESE) and exonic splicing silencers (ESS) in human inherited disease is still poorly understood. Here we use a top-down approach to determine rates of loss or gain of known human exonic splicing regulatory (ESR) sequences associated with either disease-causing mutations or putatively neutral single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). We observe significant enrichment toward loss of ESEs and gain of ESSs among inherited disease-causing variants relative to neutral polymorphisms, indicating that exon skipping may play a prominent role in aberrant gene regulation. Both computational and biochemical approaches underscore the relevance of exonic splicing enhancer loss and silencer gain in inherited disease. Additionally, we provide direct evidence that both SRp20 (SRSF3) and possibly PTB (PTBP1) are involved in the function of a splicing silencer that is created de novo by a total of 83 different inherited disease mutations in 67 different disease genes. Taken together, we find that ~25% (7154/27,681) of known mis-sense and nonsense disease-causing mutations alter functional splicing signals within exons, suggesting a much more widespread role for aberrant mRNA processing in causing human inherited disease than has hitherto been appreciated.

Indexed as

ExonsModels, GeneticBase Sequencebeta-GlobinsCodon, NonsenseComputer SimulationGenes, ReporterGenetic Diseases, InbornHeLa CellsHeredityHumansMutation, MissensePolymorphism, Single NucleotideRNA Processing, Post-TranscriptionalRNA Splice SitesRNA Splicingbeta-GlobinsCodon, NonsenseRNA Splice Sites

Identifiers

PMID21750108
PMCPMC3202274
OpenAlexW2118551099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.