ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2012
Complex and magnitude-only preprocessing of 2D and 3D BOLD fMRI data at 7 T.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of thermal and physiological denoising on laminar functional connectivity.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Predicting brain age using Tri-UNet and various MRI scale features.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Methods for cleaning the BOLD fMRI signal.NeuroImage · 2017Review
- Quantification of the statistical effects of spatiotemporal processing of nontask FMRI data.Brain connectivity · 2014Article
- Enhanced phase regression with Savitzky-Golay filtering for high-resolution BOLD fMRI.Human brain mapping · 2014Article
- Optimizing RetroICor and RetroKCor corrections for multi-shot 3D FMRI acquisitions.NeuroImage · 2014Article
- High-resolution functional MRI at 3 T: 3D/2D echo-planar imaging with optimized physiological noise correction.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2013Article
- Article
- Advances in High-Field BOLD fMRI.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A challenge to ultra high field functional magnetic resonance imaging is the predominance of noise associated with physiological processes unrelated to tasks of interest. This degradation in data quality may be partially reversed using a series of preprocessing algorithms designed to retrospectively estimate and remove the effects of these noise sources. However, such algorithms are routinely validated only in isolation, and thus consideration of their efficacies within realistic preprocessing pipelines and on different data sets is often overlooked. We investigate the application of eight possible combinations of three pseudo-complementary preprocessing algorithms - phase regression, Stockwell transform filtering, and retrospective image correction - to suppress physiological noise in 2D and 3D functional data at 7 T. The performance of each preprocessing pipeline was evaluated using data-driven metrics of reproducibility and prediction. The optimal preprocessing pipeline for both 2D and 3D functional data included phase regression, Stockwell transform filtering, and retrospective image correction. This result supports the hypothesis that a complex preprocessing pipeline is preferable to a magnitude-only pipeline, and suggests that functional magnetic resonance imaging studies should retain complex images and externally monitor subjects' respiratory and cardiac cycles so that these supplementary data may be used to retrospectively reduce noise and enhance overall data quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.