Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21748684›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2011

Assessment of development and chemotaxis in Dictyostelium discoideum mutants.

Yulia Artemenko, Kristen F Swaney, Peter N Devreotes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Shear force-based genetic screen reveals negative regulators of cell adhesion and protrusive activity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  8. Chemical and mechanical stimuli act on common signal transduction and cytoskeletal networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Novel protein Callipygian defines the back of migrating cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yulia ArtemenkoDepartment of Cell Biology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kristen F Swaney
Peter N Devreotes
Johns Hopkins Medicine · US

Funding

BIOCHEMISTRY, CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY PROGRAMT32GM007445 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GREEN, RACHEL · 1985 to 2021
$24.1M
Temporal and Spatial Signaling in ChemotaxisR01GM034933 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DEVREOTES, PETER N · 1987 to 2015
$8.8M
Signaling Networks in Chemotaxis and CytokinesisR37GM028007 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DEVREOTES, PETER N · 2005 to 2014
$6.3M
SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION AND DICTYOSTELIUM DEVELOPMENTR01GM028007 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DEVREOTES, PETER N · 1985 to 2004
$2.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM28007NIGMS NIH HHS GM34933NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM028007NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM034933NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM028007NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007445
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies using the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum have greatly contributed to the current understanding of the signaling network that underlies chemotaxis. Since directed migration is essential for normal D. discoideum multicellular development, mutants with chemotactic impairments are likely to have abnormal developmental morphologies. We have used multicellular development as a readout in a screen of mutants to identify new potential regulators of chemotaxis. In this chapter, we describe how mutants generated by restriction enzyme-mediated integration (REMI) are analyzed, from assessment of development to detailed characterization of 3',5'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)-induced responses. Two complementary approaches, plating cells either clonally on a bacterial lawn or as a population on non-nutrient agar, are used to evaluate multicellular development. Once mutants with aberrant developmental phenotypes are identified, their chemotaxis toward cAMP is assessed by both small population and micropipette assays. Furthermore, mutants are tested for defects in both general and specific signaling pathways by examining the recruitment of actin-binding LimE(Δcoil) or PIP3-binding PH domains to the plasma membrane in response to cAMP stimulation.

Indexed as

ChemotaxisActinsCell Culture TechniquesCell Migration AssaysCulture MediaCyclic AMPDictyosteliumMicroscopy, VideoMutagenesis, InsertionalPhenotypePhosphatidylinositolsProtozoan ProteinsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsTime-Lapse ImagingActinsCulture MediaCyclic AMPPhosphatidylinositolsphosphoinositide-3,4,5-triphosphateProtozoan ProteinsRecombinant Fusion Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21748684
PMCPMC4374595
OpenAlexW2130577289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.