Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21748660›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2011

Attitudes and beliefs of African-Americans toward genetics, genetic testing, and sickle cell disease education and awareness.

Katie A Long, Stephen B Thomas, Robin E Grubs, Elizabeth A Gettig, Lakshmanan Krishnamurti

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02326597 (Comparative Effectiveness of a Decision Aid for Therapeutic Options in Sickle Cell Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02326597 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Effectiveness of a Decision Aid for Therapeutic Options in Sickle Cell Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorEmory UniversityRan2015 to 2017Enrolled134ConditionsSickle Cell Disease, Sickle Cell Anemia, Hemoglobin SS, Hemoglobin SCArmsDecision Aid Tool, Standard Practice
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. African American Living Donors' Attitudes About APOL1 Genetic Testing: A Mixed Methods Study.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katie A LongDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. katie.long@chp.edu
Stephen B Thomas
Robin E Grubs
Elizabeth A Gettig
Lakshmanan Krishnamurti

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING COREP60MD000207 · NIMHD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI THOMAS, STEPHEN B. · 2002 to 2011
$10.8M
NIMHD NIH HHS PG60MD000207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research among African-Americans indicates this population perceives sickle cell (SCD) to be a serious disease and sickle cell trait (SCT) screening an important intervention. However, studies have consistently demonstrated a lower than desired uptake of SCD education, inadequate knowledge regarding personal and family trait status, and a low perceived susceptibility of giving birth to a child with the disease. We examined general attitudes and beliefs regarding genetics and genetic testing including prenatal testing and newborn screening; we used this information as the foundation to more specifically assess attitudes and beliefs regarding SCD and perceived barriers to SCD education and awareness. Thirty-five African-American adult men and women participated in one of four focus groups. Thematic analysis identified that both prenatal testing and newborn screening are acceptable forms of genetic testing. Based largely on their personal experiences, participants possessed an understanding of the natural progression of SCD but had a limited understanding of the inheritance and probable risk of giving birth to a child with the disease. Barriers to education and greater awareness of SCD were classified as personal, familial, and societal. Community based interventions focused on sharing the stories of individuals with first-hand experiences with SCD should be considered.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthAwarenessBlack PeopleGenetic TestingAnemia, Sickle CellBlack or African AmericanFemaleFocus GroupsGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMalePatient Education as Topic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.